这次记录更新意味着什么
结构化记录概览
涉及 22 条 (更正/调整 14 · 补录 7 · 暂缓 1)
AI 工具使用规则 · 学术诚信 · 另 4 个主题
本次修订尚无经独立审核的摘要。
这是历史记录摘要,不确认当前使用权限,也不证明学校发布了新规。
学术诚信 · 涉及 5 条 (更正/调整 3 · 补录 1 · 暂缓 1)
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS policy states that verdicts from AI detection tools are not admissible as conclusive evidence in disciplinary processes to charge students with academic dishonesty or to penalize student work.
+新文本NUS policy states that verdicts of AI tools purporting to determine whether an input was generated by AI are not admissible as evidence in disciplinary processes to charge students with academic dishonesty or as justification to penalize student work.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS requires students to cite AI-generated content according to style guide conventions and to check assignment guidelines for specific AI use instructions.
+新文本NUS Libraries guidance instructs students to always check assignment guidelines for specific AI instructions and consult citation style guides and publisher policies when using AI in academic or published work.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS policy states that representing AI output as one's own work without acknowledgement is plagiarism; students who submit AI-generated work without acknowledging its use can be sanctioned for academic dishonesty.
+新文本NUS policy states that submitting AI-generated work without acknowledging AI use constitutes academic dishonesty and plagiarism, punishable under university disciplinary processes assuming the case can be made.
本站补录
新增
+NUS policy strictly prohibits sharing AI tool accounts under any circumstances; using a shared account may raise collusion concerns and, where misconduct is established, may result in disciplinary action.
暂缓/移出当前结论
保留历史文字,不代表学校撤销了规则。
Student disciplinary decisions under NUS Statute 6 feature two adjudication tiers with a general 14-day appeal clock under Regulation 10; detailed statutory exceptions, filing formalities, and start events remain UNVERIFIED pending full statute text.
暂缓/移出当前结论教学 · 涉及 5 条 (更正/调整 3 · 补录 2)
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS requires prior approval from Head of Department or relevant Deanery before using AI tools to provide instruction, feedback, or marks to students, submitted via an AI Risk Assessment.
+新文本NUS policy requires prior approval by Head of Department or Deanery under oversight of Chair of AI-COP, obtained via submission to the AI System for Assurance and Evaluation, before deploying AI to provide instruction, feedback, or marks. In general, except for AI marking of objective or closed-ended assessments, a human instructor or reviewer should remain in the loop, and spot checks should still be conducted even where scoring is considered reliable.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS states that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in courses, including for generating content, virtual tutoring, and assessment feedback.
+新文本NUS policy recommends that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in NUS courses, particularly when generating content, acting as virtual tutors, or aiding assessment feedback and grading.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments, provided use is duly acknowledged; assessments forbidding AI must be conducted in-person and instructor-supervised.
+新文本NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments with due acknowledgement; if an assessment forbids AI for pedagogical reasons, crucial aspects of that assessment should be conducted in person and under instructor supervision.
本站补录
新增
+NUS commits to providing an institutionally supported baseline of AI tools for learning, requiring instructors to be mindful that tool access differences do not amplify inequities among students.
本站补录
新增
+Starting from Academic Year 2026/27, NUS requires all incoming first-year undergraduate students to complete the compulsory foundational AI literacy module THE1008 Applied Generative AI: From Prompting to Evaluation.
研究 · 涉及 1 条 (补录 1)
本站补录
新增
+NUS Press prohibits submitting manuscripts containing wording from AI models (including AI polishing/streamlining) and requires detailed tool declarations upon submission; AI images and diagrams are not accepted.
AI 工具使用规则 · 涉及 9 条 (更正/调整 6 · 补录 3)
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Chat is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Chat is an internal enterprise chat productivity tool within NUS IT's AI-Know platform, deployed primarily across university staff departments; general student backend access is unverified.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Create is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Create is a citizen-development platform within the AI-Know suite enabling NUS staff to create customized AI solutions; students access specific published chatbots via the Marketplace tab.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Draw is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Draw is an internal visual and diagramming tool within NUS IT's AI-Know suite for staff workflows; general student access is unverified.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Guide is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Guide is an internal guidance and advisory productivity tool within NUS IT's AI-Know suite for staff workflows; general student access is unverified.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Know is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Know is NUS IT's in-house enterprise AI platform and training suite, serving nearly 1,000 staff across 120+ departments; student expansion is planned on the horizon and partially mediated through specific applications.
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本AI-Minute is listed for National University of Singapore (NUS) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
+新文本AI-Minute is an automated meeting minutes generator within the AI-Know suite deployed for university administrative staff; general student access is unverified.
本站补录
新增
+NUS Libraries and NUS IT announced AI Sense Maker, a conversational AI literature discovery platform powered by OpenAI LLM scheduled to be officially launched on 20 August 2026, indexing over 150,000 institutional library assets.
本站补录
新增
+NUS Centre for Future-ready Graduates provides current students with CFG AI-Xplore, a virtual career advisory chatbot hosted on the AI-Know platform accessed via the AI-Create Marketplace tab.
本站补录
新增
+Starting 31 August 2026, NUS provides all students, faculty, and staff with access to ChatGPT Edu in a university-managed environment where workspace conversations and data are excluded from training OpenAI models.
采购 · 涉及 1 条 (更正/调整 1)
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS policy requires that wherever NUS data is involved, only NUS-approved AI tools should be used.
+新文本NUS policy states that instructors should use NUS-approved AI tools whenever NUS data is involved, defining NUS data as information managed, protected, or controlled under university obligations.
来源状态 · 涉及 1 条 (更正/调整 1)
本站更正
本站结论文字对照
−旧文本NUS has an institutional Policy for Use of AI in Teaching and Learning, supplemented by AI guidelines infographics and resources for students.
+新文本NUS maintains an institutional Policy for Use of AI in Teaching and Learning (current version 15 Sept 2026), supplemented by Library Essentials guidelines infographics and THE1005 module resources.
官方来源 · 来源检查
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。
来源检查
暂无可比较的新旧文字。