变更日志

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 USI - Università della Svizzera italiana。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # USI - Università della Svizzera italiana AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.
3+Evidence (en, ce40274d906f): As a general rule the use of generative AI tools is thus permitted, unless explicitly prohibited for a specific activity (e.g. exam, assignment, specific tasks, etc.). However, their use must always be correctly acknowledged.
4+academic_integrity: USI student recommendations say students must follow teachers' instructions for GenAI use in written work; complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, or final papers with GenAI is generally not permitted, and unauthorised use is academic fraud subject to study-regulation penalties.
5+Evidence (en, 9d961559b95a): In general, when writing exam papers, final papers, theses, etc., students are required to strictly follow their teachers' instructions regarding the use of Gen AI tools. As a general rule, the use of Gen AI tools for the complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, final papers, etc. is not permitted.
6+source_status: USI maintains a public generative-AI guidance hub and June 2025 recommendations for both students and teaching staff; the Desk page says those recommendations expand and replace earlier 2023 communications.
7+Evidence (en, ce40274d906f): In June 2025, the Recommendations on the use of generative AI in education for USI's faculty and students have been published. These documents expand and replace previous communications of 2023.
8+teaching: USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.
9+Evidence (en, b3622234b5f3): Teachers are advised to clearly communicate at the beginning and during the course what students should /can /cannot do with Gen AI tools for learning activities related to their course. For this purpose, it is recommended to include a section in the course syllabus summarising the relevant information.
10+privacy: USI recommendations say GenAI use should account for data protection and that confidential documents and sensitive data should not be shared with GenAI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 9d961559b95a): Gen AI must be used critically, competently and responsibly, paying particular attention to the trustworthiness of the answers provided, data protection, environmental sustainability aspects, and ensuring that confidential documents and sensitive data are not shared.
12+academic_integrity: USI teaching-staff recommendations strongly discourage reliance on tools designed to detect GenAI-generated text, saying suspected misuse should follow normal misconduct procedures defined in faculty study regulations.
13+Evidence (en, b3622234b5f3): However, it is strongly discouraged to rely on tools designed to detect text generated with the help of Gen AI (e.g. ChatGPTzero and similar). These tools are still unreliable and of little use, as they only provide a statistical estimate without offering any definite proof of the actual use of such tools.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

6 声明 条记录

ai_tool_treatment

USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据2语言en

academic_integrity

USI student recommendations say students must follow teachers' instructions for GenAI use in written work; complete drafting of exam papers, dissertations, or final papers with GenAI is generally not permitted, and unauthorised use is academic fraud subject to study-regulation penalties.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据2语言en

source_status

USI maintains a public generative-AI guidance hub and June 2025 recommendations for both students and teaching staff; the Desk page says those recommendations expand and replace earlier 2023 communications.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据2语言en

teaching

USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

privacy

USI recommendations say GenAI use should account for data protection and that confidential documents and sensitive data should not be shared with GenAI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据2语言en

academic_integrity

USI teaching-staff recommendations strongly discourage reliance on tools designed to detect GenAI-generated text, saying suspected misuse should follow normal misconduct procedures defined in faculty study regulations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

源快照

4 source attributions

Generative AI at USI

official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月16日 23:31

快照哈希值
d56fb83d8628ca930feef41ccd133d019dbea241bab6d39837091213524cdfde