public-release-20260715-005
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
Uppsala University public-release-20260715-005 差异
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
变更日志
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Uppsala University currently has 12 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年7月19日. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Uppsala University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
1 公开发布差异
与 public-release-20260714-002 相比。
将 public-release-20260714-002 与 public-release-20260715-005 进行比较。
12 声明 条记录
Microsoft Copilot is listed for Uppsala University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.
Uppsala University's central guidelines say sensitive personal data may only be transferred to a university-approved generative AI system, and student material may not be transferred without the student's permission to a generative AI system that might use it to train the system.
Uppsala University's central generative AI guidelines say that any restriction on generative AI use in teaching or assessment, and any requirement to report AI use, must be clearly stated in written information; restrictions must be justifiable by learning outcomes, the nature of the task, or pedagogical considerations.
When students are expected to use generative AI in teaching or assessment, Uppsala University's central guidelines say the course coordinator or examiner must be able to ensure the tools are provided at no cost to the student; if doctoral students are expected to use generative AI, the principal supervisor has responsibility for ensuring suitable tools are available at no cost.
Uppsala University's central guidelines say a person who has used AI-generated material is responsible for how it is used, and that academic probity, a critical attitude to the reliability of the material, and ethical considerations must guide the use.
Uppsala University's central guidelines state that students who plan to use generative AI in connection with teaching or assessment are responsible for keeping informed about both central guidelines and any applicable local guidelines.
For courses offered by Uppsala University's Faculty of Law from the spring term of 2026, the Faculty guidelines say AI-generated material is not permitted in assessment components unless course documentation explicitly states otherwise; AI-based proofreading tools may be used without reporting, but not for generating new content.
Uppsala University's student AI-tool page says students have free access to Copilot, and that when students log in with their student account, their interactions are covered by the university's Microsoft data-protection agreement, chat data is not saved, and data is not used to train Copilot's large language models.
Uppsala University's student guidance says students with questions about generative AI use in a course should contact their teacher; it also says prohibited generative AI use can be reported to the university disciplinary board and may lead to sanctions such as suspension.
Uppsala University's local AI-guidelines index says more institutions, programmes, units, and departments at the university are producing their own AI-use guidelines; the same page states that the university-wide guideline applies from 20 January 2025 and covers education at all levels through doctoral education.
Uppsala University's staff examination guidance advises teachers to use UU's Copilot and remove identifying information if uploading student texts for AI-assisted feedback, and says that for now it is wise to refrain from letting AI grade exams.
Uppsala University's research AI introduction states that it is practical support rather than a rulebook; its quickstart guidance tells researchers to use Copilot Chat via UU login, never share sensitive or confidential information in an AI tool, double-check AI-generated material, and document how AI tools are used.
8 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年7月15日 23:25
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:31
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:36
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:32
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:34
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:35
official_pdf Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:30
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月13日 22:33