Change log

The University of Queensland

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

The University of Queensland currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 3 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted3Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

The University of Queensland release diff

Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.

+9-0
11 # The University of Queensland AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+teaching: University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.
5+Evidence (en, bb5f32e6444d): Your course coordinators have provided guidance in your course profiles defining the appropriate use of AI in each assessment task.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Queensland says inappropriate or unacknowledged AI use in assessment may be considered misconduct.
10+Evidence (en, bb5f32e6444d): If you use AI in your assessment inappropriately or without suitable acknowledgment it may be considered misconduct.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: University of Queensland disabled Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.
15+Evidence (en, bb5f32e6444d): UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z

Claim changes

8 claim records

teaching

University of Queensland says course coordinators provide guidance in course profiles defining appropriate AI use for each assessment task.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Queensland says inappropriate or unacknowledged AI use in assessment may be considered misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Queensland disabled Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025, citing that AI detection tools are flawed and unreliable.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot Chat is UQ's enterprise AI tool, available to UQ staff and students, and the UQ Library says it provides a higher level of data security and privacy than other AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

6 source attributions