University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

University of Galway

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月16日最后更改时间2026年5月16日声明5来源4版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

University of Galway currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 University of Galway。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

大学 of Galway combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # University of Galway AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 3f4fb17704f7): Submitting all or part of an assessment item which has been produced using artificial intelligence (e.g. Google Translate or other machine translation services/software, generative AI, etc.) and claiming it as your own work.
4+academic_integrity: University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.
5+Evidence (en, acc0db9d9a40): You should not present the output of generative AI tools as your own work in any assignment: QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies this as misconduct. In some circumstances, your instructor may permit a limited use of generative AI tools for certain aspects of preparing for your assignment, as long as you do not present generated outputs as your own work.
6+privacy: University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.
7+Evidence (en, acc0db9d9a40): At present, University of Galway does not authorise or advocate the use of so-called AI Detectors to check students' work for the presence of generative AI content, as they have been shown to not be effective at present. You should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software, as this may constitute an improper use of personal data and/or intellectual property.
8+ai_tool_treatment: University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.
9+Evidence (en, 925d04bf5bb9): Some literacy software uses Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to power its features... work that you submit for assessment should be your own and that excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity. Use only the literacy software (and their specific versions) officially approved by DSS.
10+research: University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 3b6d3ebed094): If you choose to use ChatGPT or some other AI technology for assistance, be sure that you are transparent about it and working within your university's policies... Each citation style has different recommendations for citing generative AI tools like ChatGPT, especially regarding authorship.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

research

University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度82%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%证据1语言en

privacy

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

源快照

4 source attributions