University AI Policy Tracker

Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.

API docsGitHub repo

Change log

University of Galway

Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Claims5Sources4
University pagePublic JSON

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Galway currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim/evidence diff preview

Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.

University of Galway current policy evidence

Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.

+10-0
11 # University of Galway AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.
3+Evidence (en, 3f4fb17704f7): Submitting all or part of an assessment item which has been produced using artificial intelligence (e.g. Google Translate or other machine translation services/software, generative AI, etc.) and claiming it as your own work.
4+academic_integrity: University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.
5+Evidence (en, acc0db9d9a40): You should not present the output of generative AI tools as your own work in any assignment: QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies this as misconduct. In some circumstances, your instructor may permit a limited use of generative AI tools for certain aspects of preparing for your assignment, as long as you do not present generated outputs as your own work.
6+privacy: University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.
7+Evidence (en, acc0db9d9a40): At present, University of Galway does not authorise or advocate the use of so-called AI Detectors to check students' work for the presence of generative AI content, as they have been shown to not be effective at present. You should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software, as this may constitute an improper use of personal data and/or intellectual property.
8+ai_tool_treatment: University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.
9+Evidence (en, 925d04bf5bb9): Some literacy software uses Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to power its features... work that you submit for assessment should be your own and that excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity. Use only the literacy software (and their specific versions) officially approved by DSS.
10+research: University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 3b6d3ebed094): If you choose to use ChatGPT or some other AI technology for assistance, be sure that you are transparent about it and working within your university's policies... Each citation style has different recommendations for citing generative AI tools like ChatGPT, especially regarding authorship.

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence82%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

privacy

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

4 source attributions