Policy presence
University of Galway has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Galway, Ireland
University of Galway
University of Galway is listed as QS 2026 rank 284. University of Galway has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Galway is listed as QS 2026 rank 284. University of Galway has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Galway as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-galway.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Galway has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University of Galway has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Galway has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Galway has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
University of Galway has 4 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Galway has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Galway has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of Galway has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Galway has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_produced_assessment_claimed_as_own_work_academic_misconduct
Original evidence
Evidence 1Submitting all or part of an assessment item which has been produced using artificial intelligence (e.g. Google Translate or other machine translation services/software, generative AI, etc.) and claiming it as your own work.
Academic Integrity
University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_present_genai_output_as_own_work_limited_instructor_permitted_preparatory_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1You should not present the output of generative AI tools as your own work in any assignment: QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies this as misconduct. In some circumstances, your instructor may permit a limited use of generative AI tools for certain aspects of preparing for your assignment, as long as you do not present generated outputs as your own work.
Privacy
University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says the university does not authorise or advocate AI detectors for checking student work and says staff should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software because it may be an improper use of personal data or intellectual property.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: does_not_authorise_ai_detectors_never_upload_student_work_to_third_party_ai_detection
Original evidence
Evidence 1At present, University of Galway does not authorise or advocate the use of so-called AI Detectors to check students' work for the presence of generative AI content, as they have been shown to not be effective at present. You should never upload student work to third-party AI detection software, as this may constitute an improper use of personal data and/or intellectual property.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: dss_literacy_software_genai_features_limited_to_officially_approved_versions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Some literacy software uses Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) to power its features... work that you submit for assessment should be your own and that excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity. Use only the literacy software (and their specific versions) officially approved by DSS.
Research
University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: library_research_guide_transparency_and_citation_for_ai_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you choose to use ChatGPT or some other AI technology for assistance, be sure that you are transparent about it and working within your university's policies... Each citation style has different recommendations for citing generative AI tools like ChatGPT, especially regarding authorship.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Citing AI - AI for Research - LibGuides at University of Galway
libguides.library.universityofgalway.ie
FAQs - University of Galway
universityofgalway.ie
Literacy software and academic integrity
universityofgalway.ie
QA220 Academic Integrity Policy
universityofgalway.ie
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.