research
For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.
变更日志
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
当前收录 5 条主张、2 个官方来源。
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Universidad de Chile。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
此版本差异的语义分类。
仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。
本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。
本站历史:0 次发布记录。
当前条款记录:5 条。
For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.
The Faculty of Medicine guide proposes five principles for AI initiatives in that faculty: transparency and traceability, human supervision and non-delegation of critical judgment, equity and technological justice, academic integrity and responsible authorship, and participatory governance with continuous updating.
The Faculty of Medicine's Humanizar la Inteligencia document describes itself as an orienting guide and not as binding regulation.
The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.
The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.
官方来源记录:2 条。
official_pdf 本站检查时间 2026年5月15日 04:04
official_pdf 本站检查时间 2026年5月15日 04:04