变更日志

Universidad de Chile

本站历史:0 次发布记录。

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

当前收录 5 条主张、2 个官方来源。

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Universidad de Chile。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。

本站不提供法律或学术诚信建议;除链接指向大学官方页面的来源外,本站内容不代表大学官方声明。

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项,不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化,这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

本站结论文字0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

已记录的文字对照

仅展示已记录且 Claim ID 精确匹配的文字对照。

本站历史中暂无已记录的更新。

版本历史

本站历史:0 次发布记录。

当前条款记录

当前条款记录:5 条。

research

For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言es

ai_tool_treatment

The Faculty of Medicine guide proposes five principles for AI initiatives in that faculty: transparency and traceability, human supervision and non-delegation of critical judgment, equity and technological justice, academic integrity and responsible authorship, and participatory governance with continuous updating.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言es

source_status

The Faculty of Medicine's Humanizar la Inteligencia document describes itself as an orienting guide and not as binding regulation.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言es

privacy

The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言es

teaching

The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言es

源快照

官方来源记录:2 条。