University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Universidad de Chile

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月15日最后更改时间2026年5月15日声明5来源2版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Universidad de Chile currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月15日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Universidad de Chile。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Universidad de Chile combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Universidad de Chile AI policy record
2+source_status: The Faculty of Medicine's Humanizar la Inteligencia document describes itself as an orienting guide and not as binding regulation.
3+Evidence (es, c9ef7aad4897): Se trata de un documento de trabajo, en construcción y sujeto a revisión permanente, concebido como una guía orientadora y no como una normativa vinculante.
4+ai_tool_treatment: The Faculty of Medicine guide proposes five principles for AI initiatives in that faculty: transparency and traceability, human supervision and non-delegation of critical judgment, equity and technological justice, academic integrity and responsible authorship, and participatory governance with continuous updating.
5+Evidence (es, c9ef7aad4897): se proponen cinco principios fundamentales... transparencia y trazabilidad... supervisión humana y no delegación del juicio crítico... equidad y justicia tecnológica... integridad académica y autoría responsable... gobernanza participativa y actualización continua
6+research: For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.
7+Evidence (es, c9ef7aad4897): TRANSPARENCIA EN EL USO: declarar de forma explícita el tipo, el momento y el propósito del uso de herramientas de IA... DISTINCIÓN ENTRE AUTORÍA Y ASISTENCIA: nunca atribuir autoría a una herramienta de IA... SUPERVISIÓN HUMANA: toda producción asistida por IA debe ser validada por los autores
8+teaching: The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.
9+Evidence (es, d21e6f746c3d): Construir una política de transparencia al interior del curso, en la cual se consensúen los posibles usos junto a los y las estudiantes. Por ejemplo, definir cuándo y cómo procede la citación de la herramienta IA utilizada.
10+privacy: The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.
11+Evidence (es, d21e6f746c3d): Ética. En este aspecto, usos inadecuados de estas herramientas podrían facilitar acciones relacionadas con el plagio, violaciones de derechos de autor y propiedad intelectual... Seguridad y privacidad. Algunos riesgos a tener en consideración son la protección insuficiente de datos... uso de datos sin consentimiento...

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

research

For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言es

ai_tool_treatment

The Faculty of Medicine guide proposes five principles for AI initiatives in that faculty: transparency and traceability, human supervision and non-delegation of critical judgment, equity and technological justice, academic integrity and responsible authorship, and participatory governance with continuous updating.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言es

source_status

The Faculty of Medicine's Humanizar la Inteligencia document describes itself as an orienting guide and not as binding regulation.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言es

privacy

The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言es

teaching

The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%证据1语言es

源快照

2 source attributions