ai_tool_treatment
For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
Chalmers University of Technology
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Chalmers University of Technology currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月15日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Chalmers University of Technology。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
Chalmers University of Technology combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # Chalmers University of Technology AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.
3+Evidence (en, c434a0c201b1): You are required to assume full responsibility for your work and must be capable of justifying the choices you've made regarding its content. This includes engaging in discussions about and defending the role AI played in shaping your thesis, demonstrating a clear understanding of how it contributed.
4+privacy: For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.
5+Evidence (en, c434a0c201b1): Always consult with your Chalmers’ supervisor or relevant industry/public sector collaborators before using AI tools if you have any uncertainties, particularly concerning data privacy and ethical issues.
6+academic_integrity: Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.
7+Evidence (en, 55616ff35c1f): Claiming that what someone else has written is your own text without referencing to it correctly is considered as plagiarism. In relation to AI, this can be interpreted as either plagiarism or ghostwriting, so you need to be fully transparent in your use of AI. Describe what you have done and cite correctly, including which AI tool you have used.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.
9+Evidence (en, 55616ff35c1f): It is up to the coordinator and examiner for each individual course to decide whether and how AI tools are allowed to be used within the framework of the various examinations. Remember to ask at the beginning of each course!
10+privacy: Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.
11+Evidence (en, 2457d2ebbd30): Because of this, you should not upload material that contains sensitive or private information, or any material protected by copyright law, for example PDFs of scientific articles that you’ve downloaded from library databases. If you have text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication, you should not submit it to a chatbot, as doing so may mean relinquishing your copyright to that material.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.
13+Evidence (en, 74b4f3217b74): All students and employees at Chalmers have access to the chatbot Microsoft Copilot. In addition, Chalmers offers Microsoft Copilot Pro licenses to employees who are interested, please contact your immediate manager. Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
6 声明 条记录
privacy
For thesis work, Chalmers tells students to consult a Chalmers supervisor or relevant collaborator before using AI tools when there are uncertainties, particularly around data privacy and ethical issues.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.
审核: 智能体已审核
ai_tool_treatment
Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.
审核: 智能体已审核
privacy
Chalmers Library's ethical-use guidance says users should not upload sensitive or private information, copyright-protected material, or text intended for a thesis, dissertation, or scientific publication to chatbots.
审核: 智能体已审核
ai_tool_treatment
Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
4 source attributions
Ethical Use of AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 03:18
For Teachers
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 03:18
Regulations for the use of AI tools in thesis work
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 03:17
Using AI as a Student
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月15日 03:17