academic_integrity
The University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards treat content generated with natural-language processing tools and other AI algorithms as non-author content that must be clearly marked.
審閱: 代理已審閱
變更紀錄
University of Wroclaw
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
變更摘要
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；3 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 University of Wroclaw。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
差異類別
此次版本差異的語意分類。
已記錄的文本比對
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
發布歷程
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
當前 Claim 記錄
現行主張紀錄：5。
ai_tool_treatment
Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.
審閱: 代理已審閱
ai_tool_treatment
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team says AI tools may be used in research work for theses or term papers within arrangements with the supervisor or adviser, but their use must be ancillary and must not replace the author's critical thinking.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
The University of Wrocław Anti-Plagiarism Support Team FAQ tells students that all AI-tool use in university work must be agreed with the instructor or supervisor, and that AI should not be treated as a generator that creates a thesis instead of the student.
審閱: 代理已審閱
來源快照
官方來源紀錄：3。
FAQ - Zespół wsparcia antyplagiatowego UWr
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:09 AM
Rekomendacje ZWA w sprawie oznaczania wykorzystania AI w pracach dyplomowych i zaliczeniowych
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:06 AM
Uchwała nr 1/2024 UKJK w sprawie standardów uczciwości akademickiej
official_pdf 追蹤器檢查於 May 21, 2026, 2:10 AM