無可比較的新舊文本。
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
記錄歷史
此為本網站已審查紀錄的更新,並不代表大學已變更其政策。
相符修訂版本:4
頁面更新
修訂版本: v6-reading-rankings-ten-20261027無可比較的新舊文本。
Shared V6 reading layout and evidence presentation updated. University policy Claims, original evidence, held decisions and snapshot approvals remain unchanged; the institution audit remains PARTIAL.
紀錄維護
修訂版本: qs91-100-v6-presentation-r1-20261026涉及記錄:1 (已新增 1 項)
修訂版本: public-release-20260715-005涉及記錄:3 (已新增 3 項)
修訂版本: public-release-20260526-003涉及記錄:3 (已新增 3 項)
AI 工具處置方式 · 學術誠信
University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.