變更紀錄

Université Grenoble Alpes

追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。

變更摘要

目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。

6 條當前主張;1 個官方來源。

此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異,適用於 Université Grenoble Alpes。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

本追蹤器並非法律意見,亦非學術誠信建議;除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁,否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。

新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目,不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變,本身並不等同於政策變動。

差異類別

此次版本差異的語意分類。

追蹤器主張文字0新擷取0證據0來源快照0原文0已新增來源0來源已移除0

已記錄的文本比對

僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。

此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。

發布歷程

追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。

當前 Claim 記錄

現行主張紀錄:6。

research

UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準91%證據1語言fr

research

UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準94%證據1語言fr

privacy

UGA's AI reference framework says that before transmitting personal data, users must ensure GDPR and European rules are respected, and any transmission of professional data must be approved by the institution after analysis.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準93%證據1語言fr

academic_integrity

UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準95%證據1語言fr

teaching

Outside knowledge assessment, UGA's AI reference framework leaves AI-use instructions to the teacher and teaching team, while stating that an AI tool must not substitute for the student's exercise of the skills used in the assignment.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準92%證據1語言fr

academic_integrity

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

審閱: 代理已審閱信心水準94%證據1語言fr

來源快照

官方來源紀錄:1。