research
UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.
變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
6 條當前主張;1 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異,適用於 Université Grenoble Alpes。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見,亦非學術誠信建議;除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁,否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目,不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變,本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史:0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄:6。
UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.
UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.
UGA's AI reference framework says that before transmitting personal data, users must ensure GDPR and European rules are respected, and any transmission of professional data must be approved by the institution after analysis.
UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.
Outside knowledge assessment, UGA's AI reference framework leaves AI-use instructions to the teacher and teaching team, while stating that an AI tool must not substitute for the student's exercise of the skills used in the assignment.
UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.
官方來源紀錄:1。
official_pdf 追蹤器檢查於 May 16, 2026, 5:31 AM