research
UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Change log
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Current public record freshness and review state.
Université Grenoble Alpes currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
6 claim records
UGA's AI reference framework strongly discourages transmitting unpublished or unpatented research work to a generative AI tool, for example for translation or summarization.
UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.
UGA's AI reference framework says that before transmitting personal data, users must ensure GDPR and European rules are respected, and any transmission of professional data must be approved by the institution after analysis.
UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.
Outside knowledge assessment, UGA's AI reference framework leaves AI-use instructions to the teacher and teaching team, while stating that an AI tool must not substitute for the student's exercise of the skills used in the assignment.
UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.
1 source attribution
official_pdf checked May 16, 2026