變更紀錄
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；1 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Saarland University。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
此次版本差異的語意分類。
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
現行主張紀錄：5。
Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.
Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.
Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.
Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.
Saarland University guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets the university's data-protection requirements, and states that ChatGPT is not provided by the university so users are responsible for considering data-protection aspects themselves.
官方來源紀錄：1。
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 5:05 PM
