University AI Policy Tracker

Otwarte, oparte na dowodach rekordy polityk AI uczelni do publicznego uzycia.

APIGitHub
Jezyk
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Saarland University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Claims5Sources1Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Saarland University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Saarland University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Saarland University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Saarland University AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.
3+Evidence (de, 6e6272b8b80d): Wird generative KI unerlaubt beim Erbringen von Studien- oder Prüfungsleistungen eingesetzt und/oder wird der Einsatz von diesen entgegen entsprechender Anforderung nicht adäquat gekennzeichnet und dokumentiert, handelt es sich um eine Täuschung, welche zur Ungültigkeit von Prüfungs- und Studienleistungen und in schweren Fällen zum Verlust des Prüfungsanspruchs führen kann.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.
5+Evidence (de, 6e6272b8b80d): Generell gilt: Die Verwendung generativer KI als Hilfsmittel zur Erbringung von Studien- und Prüfungsleistungen ist grundsätzlich erlaubt. Die Verwendung kann jedoch von der/dem Dozierenden bzw. Prüfenden auf bestimmte Funktionen beschränkt oder gänzlich untersagt werden.
6+academic_integrity: Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.
7+Evidence (de, 6e6272b8b80d): Entscheidend ist, dass generative KI den Stellenwert von Hilfsmitteln innehaben und die Eigenleistung der Studierenden keinesfalls ersetzt. Leistungsanforderungen sind so zu gestalten, dass bei der Leistungserbringung eine signifikante Eigenleistung der Studierenden sichergestellt ist.
8+academic_integrity: Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.
9+Evidence (de, 6e6272b8b80d): Grundsätzlich ist keine explizite Dokumentation der Verwendung erforderlich und die Angaben zur Art der Verwendung im Rahmen der Eigenständigkeitserklärung sind ausreichend. Ein*e Prüfer*in kann dessen ungeachtet aber zur Nachvollziehung des Lern-Prüfungsprozesses im Vorfeld transparent und schriftlich die Notwendigkeit der Kenntlichmachung formulieren.
10+privacy: Saarland University guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets the university's data-protection requirements, and states that ChatGPT is not provided by the university so users are responsible for considering data-protection aspects themselves.
11+Evidence (de, 6e6272b8b80d): An der Universität des Saarlandes stehen folgende Plattformen zur Verfügung: Microsoft Copilot Chat ... HAWKI ... Sie stellen eine Alternative zu kommerziellen KI-Tools dar und entsprechen den datenschutzrechtlichen Anforderungen der Universität. Zusätzlich ist das Sprachmodell ChatGPT von OpenAI bekannt und weit verbreitet. Es wird jedoch nicht von der Universität bereitgestellt.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

Saarland University guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets the university's data-protection requirements, and states that ChatGPT is not provided by the university so users are responsible for considering data-protection aspects themselves.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

1 source attribution