University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Saarbrücken, Germany

Saarland University

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%
Public JSONChange logMonthly reportCitation rulesDataset accessAnalysis JSONSubmit correction
Public JSONCitation rules
More tools

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage5 reviewedEvidence-backed claims5Reviewed5Candidate0Official sources1Source languagedePublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/saarland-university.json

Policy profile

Analysis JSONAnalysis review
Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence76%

Coursework

Saarland University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-saarland-ai-own-work-boundary

Privacy and data entry

Saarland University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1
Claim claim-saarland-ai-platforms-and-data

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Tools directory
Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: unauthorized_or_undocumented_ai_use_treated_as_deception

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Wird generative KI unerlaubt beim Erbringen von Studien- oder Prüfungsleistungen eingesetzt und/oder wird der Einsatz von diesen entgegen entsprechender Anforderung nicht adäquat gekennzeichnet und dokumentiert, handelt es sich um eine Täuschung, welche zur Ungültigkeit von Prüfungs- und Studienleistungen und in schweren Fällen zum Verlust des Prüfungsanspruchs führen kann.

Localized display only

Unauthorized use, or inadequate documentation when required, is treated as deception and can invalidate assessments or lead to loss of examination entitlement in serious cases.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
6e6272b8b80d61086eb6fcb6a8ef461f1e9ca0269de200aca85ed79ff08816b8
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF page 2, section 'Was passiert bei unerlaubter Verwendung generativer KI?'

Ai Tool Treatment

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: generative_ai_generally_allowed_as_aid_with_instructor_limits

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Generell gilt: Die Verwendung generativer KI als Hilfsmittel zur Erbringung von Studien- und Prüfungsleistungen ist grundsätzlich erlaubt. Die Verwendung kann jedoch von der/dem Dozierenden bzw. Prüfenden auf bestimmte Funktionen beschränkt oder gänzlich untersagt werden.

Localized display only

In general, generative AI may be used as an aid for coursework and examinations, but instructors or examiners may restrict or prohibit it.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
6e6272b8b80d61086eb6fcb6a8ef461f1e9ca0269de200aca85ed79ff08816b8
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF page 1, section 'Wie kann generative KI im Kontext von Prüfungen verwendet werden?'

Academic Integrity

Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: ai_as_aid_not_replacement_for_student_own_work

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Entscheidend ist, dass generative KI den Stellenwert von Hilfsmitteln innehaben und die Eigenleistung der Studierenden keinesfalls ersetzt. Leistungsanforderungen sind so zu gestalten, dass bei der Leistungserbringung eine signifikante Eigenleistung der Studierenden sichergestellt ist.

Localized display only

The guidance treats generative AI as an aid and says it must not replace students' own work; assessments should ensure significant student contribution.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
6e6272b8b80d61086eb6fcb6a8ef461f1e9ca0269de200aca85ed79ff08816b8
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF page 1, section 'Wie kann generative KI im Kontext von Prüfungen verwendet werden?'

Academic Integrity

Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: ai_documentation_generally_declaration_based_examiners_may_require_more

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Grundsätzlich ist keine explizite Dokumentation der Verwendung erforderlich und die Angaben zur Art der Verwendung im Rahmen der Eigenständigkeitserklärung sind ausreichend. Ein*e Prüfer*in kann dessen ungeachtet aber zur Nachvollziehung des Lern-Prüfungsprozesses im Vorfeld transparent und schriftlich die Notwendigkeit der Kenntlichmachung formulieren.

Localized display only

Explicit documentation is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
6e6272b8b80d61086eb6fcb6a8ef461f1e9ca0269de200aca85ed79ff08816b8
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF page 2, section 'Wie ist die Verwendung generativer KI zu dokumentieren?'

Privacy

Saarland University guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets the university's data-protection requirements, and states that ChatGPT is not provided by the university so users are responsible for considering data-protection aspects themselves.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: copilot_hawki_available_chatgpt_not_university_provided_data_responsibility

Last checked
May 17, 2026
Last changed
May 17, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
An der Universität des Saarlandes stehen folgende Plattformen zur Verfügung: Microsoft Copilot Chat ... HAWKI ... Sie stellen eine Alternative zu kommerziellen KI-Tools dar und entsprechen den datenschutzrechtlichen Anforderungen der Universität. Zusätzlich ist das Sprachmodell ChatGPT von OpenAI bekannt und weit verbreitet. Es wird jedoch nicht von der Universität bereitgestellt.

Localized display only

The guidance lists Microsoft Copilot Chat and HAWKI as available platforms, says HAWKI meets university data-protection requirements, and says ChatGPT is not university-provided.

Source language
de
Snapshot hash
6e6272b8b80d61086eb6fcb6a8ef461f1e9ca0269de200aca85ed79ff08816b8
Retrieved
May 17, 2026
Evidence locator
PDF page 3, section 'Verfügbarkeit generativer KI an der UdS'

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Open contribution pathsReview workflow
Back to universities