Istanbul, Türkiye

Yildiz Technical University

Yildiz Technical University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.

Yildiz Technical University AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Yildiz Technical University has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Yildiz Technical University is listed as QS 2026 rank 731-740.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Yildiz Technical University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/yildiz-technical-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageen, trPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/yildiz-technical-university.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

Yildiz Technical University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence81%Evidence1Sources1

Academic integrity

Yildiz Technical University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Yildiz Technical University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence79%Evidence1Sources1

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

The YTU generative AI guide says personal, confidential, unpublished, student, patient, participant, or trade-secret information must not be entered into generative AI tools.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: no_sensitive_or_personal_data_in_genai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Proje başvurusu ile ilgili gizli bilgiler, yayımlanmamış araştırma bulguları, KVKK kapsamında korunan kişisel veriler (öğrenci bilgileri, hasta verileri, katılımcı kimlik bilgileri vb.) veya üçüncü taraflara ait ticari sır niteliğindeki bilgilerin ÜYZ araçlarına girilmesi ya da yüklenmesi kesinlikle yasaktır.

Localized display only

Confidential project information, unpublished findings, protected personal data, and trade-secret information must not be entered or uploaded to generative AI tools.

Ai Tool Treatment

Yıldız Technical University's generative AI guide states that YTU academic personnel must disclose generative AI use beyond basic spelling and grammar checking in research, publication, thesis or academic assignment contexts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: disclosure_required_for_substantive_genai_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Şeffaflık ve hesap verebilirlik ilkeleri doğrultusunda; temel yazım ve dilbilgisi denetiminin ötesine geçen tüm ÜYZ kullanımlarının beyan edilmesi zorunludur.

Localized display only

Beyond basic spelling and grammar checks, all generative AI use must be disclosed.

Academic Integrity

The YTU generative AI guide states that AI-generated draft text should never be used as final text and should only be treated as a starting point that the researcher substantially rewrites or revises.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_draft_not_final_text

Original evidence

Evidence 1
ÜYZ tarafından üretilen taslak metinler asla nihai metin olarak kullanılmamalıdır. Araştırmacı, üretilen taslağı yalnızca bir başlangıç noktası olarak değerlendirmeli; içeriği kendi bilgi ve analizi doğrultusunda kapsamlı biçimde yeniden yazmalı veya ÜYZ ile çok aşamalı olacak şekilde detaylı revizyon süreci kapsamında yazdırmalıdır.

Localized display only

AI-generated draft text should never be used as final text; the researcher should treat it only as a starting point and substantially rewrite or revise it.

Research

Yıldız Journal of Educational Research requires submitting authors to disclose whether AI-assisted technologies were used and to describe how they were used in the cover letter and submitted work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: journal_authors_disclose_ai_assistance

Original evidence

Evidence 1
At submission, the journal should require authors to disclose whether they used artificial intelligence (AI)– assisted technologies (such as Large Language Models [LLMs], chatbots, or image creators) in the production of submitted work. Authors who use such technology should describe, in both the cover letter and the submitted work, how they used it.

Localized display only

At submission, authors must disclose AI-assisted technology use and describe how it was used in the cover letter and submitted work.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities