Policy presence
Vytautas Magnus University has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Kaunas, Lithuania
Vytautas Magnus University
Vytautas Magnus University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Vytautas Magnus University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Vytautas Magnus University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 3 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Vytautas Magnus University is listed as QS 2026 rank 741-750.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Vytautas Magnus University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/vytautas-magnus-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Vytautas Magnus University has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Vytautas Magnus University has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Privacy and data entry
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Academic integrity
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Approved tools
Vytautas Magnus University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Teaching guidance
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
Vytautas Magnus University has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
VMU guidance requires clear indication of what part of student work used GAI and for what purpose, and states that students are responsible for generated content they submit.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: disclose_use_and_student_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 17. Naudojant GDI studijų procese privaloma aiškiai nurodyti kuri dalis ir kokiu tikslu naudojama, laikytis akademinio sąžiningumo principų bei nurodyti šaltiniuose laikantis akademinių padalinių patvirtintų metodinių reikalavimų rašto darbams. 16. ... Už sugeneruotą turinį atsako studentas, pateikdamas atsiskaitymo medžiagą.
Localized display only
GAI use in the study process must be clearly indicated by part and purpose, and the student is responsible for generated content submitted for assessment.
Ai Tool Treatment
VMU Study Regulations allow artificial-intelligence tools in courses, written work, and independent assignments when use follows university provisions, unit procedures, course-description purposes, and academic-integrity rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: conditional_allowed
Original evidence
Evidence 198. Studijų dalykų studijose, rengiant rašto darbus, atliekant savarankiško darbo užduotis, gali būti naudojami dirbtinio intelekto įrankiai vadovaujantis Universiteto nuostatomis, padalinio nustatyta tvarka ir studijų dalyko apraše numatytais tikslais, laikantis akademinio sąžiningumo principų, nustatytų Etikos kodekse ir Plagiato prevencijos nuostatuose.
Localized display only
Clause 98 allows AI tools in studies, written work, and independent assignments when used under university/unit/course rules and academic-integrity principles.
Teaching
VMU guidance says the extent and conditions for generative AI use may be set at course, study-program committee, or academic-unit level.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_program_or_unit_rules
Original evidence
Evidence 15. GDI gali būti naudojamas tokia apimtimi ir tokiomis sąlygomis, kurios dėstytojo nustatomos studijų dalyko lygmenyje ar studijų programų komiteto (SPK) – studijų programos lygmenyje. Gali būti akademinio padalinio lygmens sprendimai visoms to padalinio vykdomoms studijoms.
Localized display only
GAI use may be set by the teacher at course level, by the study-program committee at program level, or by an academic unit for its studies.
Security Review
VMU's Senate strategic position says AI tools should be validated in relevant units before being implemented and used in university activities to ensure safety and compatibility with EU and Lithuanian law.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: validate_before_implementation_or_use
Original evidence
Evidence 12. Prieš diegiant ir naudojant DI universiteto veiklose, atitinkamuose padaliniuose turėtų būti atliekamas DI įrankių validavimas, siekiant užtikrinti, kad naudojami įrankiai būtų saugūs ir derėtų su Europos Sąjungos ir Lietuvos Respublikos teisės aktais.
Localized display only
Before deploying and using AI in university activities, relevant units should validate AI tools to ensure safety and compatibility with EU and Lithuanian law.
Research
VMU guidance for scientific and artistic research says researchers and artists must use AI honestly, prudently, and responsibly, and should verify AI-generated results in reliable scientific sources.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsible_research_use_and_verify_outputs
Original evidence
Evidence 11. ... tyrėjai ir menininkai privalo naudoti DI įrankius sąžiningai, apdairiai ir atsakingai, kritiškai vertindami DI generuojamos informacijos patikimumą ir jos atitikimą etikos reikalavimams. 8. ... DI generuojamas užklausos rezultatas turi būti patikrintas patikimuose mokslinės informacijos šaltiniuose.
Localized display only
Researchers and artists must use AI honestly, carefully, and responsibly, and AI-generated query results must be checked in reliable scientific information sources.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto generatyvinio dirbtinio intelekto naudojimo studiju procese gaires ir rekomendacijos
vdu.lt
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto Senato strategine pozicija del dirbtinio intelekto universiteto veiklose
vdu.lt
Vytauto Didziojo universiteto studiju reguliaminas
vdu.lt
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.