Policy presence
University of the Basque Country has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Leioa, Spain
University of the Basque Country
University of the Basque Country has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 3 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
University of the Basque Country AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of the Basque Country has 3 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 3 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: University of the Basque Country is listed as QS 2026 rank =624.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of the Basque Country as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 3 source-backed claims, including 3 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-the-basque-country.json. The entity-level confidence is 93%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of the Basque Country has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of the Basque Country has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
University of the Basque Country has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
University of the Basque Country has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
University of the Basque Country has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of the Basque Country has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
University of the Basque Country has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
University of the Basque Country has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
EHU says generative AI use is not prohibited, but it must be transparent, ethical, responsible, and consistent with institutional academic-integrity principles.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_allowed_with_transparency_and_integrity_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1En consecuencia, el uso de IA generativa en EHU no está prohibido, pero sí requiere transparencia, atribución adecuada y un uso ético, conforme a principios institucionales de integridad académica.
Localized display only
EHU states that generative AI use is not prohibited, but it requires transparency, proper attribution, and ethical use consistent with academic integrity.
Academic Integrity
EHU guidance says generative AI use must be explicitly declared in generated works and especially in final-degree projects, master's theses, and doctoral theses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: explicit_declaration_required_for_ai_use_in_generated_academic_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Por ello, el uso de sistemas de IA generativa debe ser explícitamente declarado en los trabajos y contenidos generados y, especialmente, en trabajos como TFGs, TFMs o Tesis Doctorales.
Localized display only
EHU says use of generative AI systems must be explicitly declared in generated works and especially in TFGs, TFMs, or doctoral theses.
Privacy
EHU guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including presenting AI-generated content as one's own, using AI-generated content in work without declaring it, entering student or research-subject personal data, and uploading confidential or sensitive personal or institutional information.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: prohibited_uses_include_undeclared_ai_content_and_sensitive_data_entry
Original evidence
Evidence 1Usos prohibidos de IA generativa: Presentar los contenidos generados por la IA generativa como propios; Utilización de los contenidos generados por la IA generativa en trabajos sin declarar su uso; Introducción de datos personales del estudiantado o de sujetos de investigación; Subir documentos confidenciales o con información personal o institucional sensible.
Localized display only
EHU lists as prohibited uses presenting AI-generated content as one's own, using AI-generated content in work without declaring it, entering student or research-subject personal data, and uploading confidential or sensitive information.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Principios y recomendaciones de uso de la IA generativa en EHU
ehu.eus
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.