Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Mons, Belgium
University of Mons
University of Mons has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
University of Mons AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of Mons has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: University of Mons is listed as QS 2026 rank 781-790.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Mons as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-mons.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of Mons has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of Mons has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
University of Mons has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
University of Mons has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.
Academic integrity
University of Mons has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
University of Mons has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
University of Mons has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
UMONS prohibits presenting AI-generated content, including text, images, code, or music, as one's own creation in academic work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: presenting_ai_generated_content_as_own_creation_prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1Il est interdit de présenter des contenus générés par l'IA (textes, images, codes, musiques, etc.) comme étant de sa propre création
Localized display only
It is prohibited to present AI-generated content, including text, images, code, or music, as one's own creation.
Academic Integrity
UMONS states that when submitted work incorporates AI-generated elements, those elements must be cited according to appropriate bibliographic standards.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_elements_require_citation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Lorsqu'un travail incorpore des éléments générés par une IA (textes, images, codes, etc.), ceux-ci doivent être dûment cités selon les normes bibliographiques appropriées.
Localized display only
When work incorporates AI-generated elements, those elements must be properly cited according to appropriate bibliographic standards.
Academic Integrity
UMONS warns that students who use AI systems to complete all or part of their academic work may be exposed to sanctions identified in the university's General Study Regulations and jury and assessment rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_ai_use_may_trigger_sanctions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Les étudiants qui envisagent de recourir à des systèmes d’IA pour réaliser en tout ou partie leurs travaux académiques s'exposent à des sanctions identifiées dans le Règlement Général des Etudes de l’UMONS et les Règles des jurys et d’évaluations
Localized display only
Students who use AI systems to carry out all or part of academic work may be exposed to sanctions identified in UMONS study and assessment rules.
Ai Tool Treatment
UMONS allows students to use artificial intelligence freely and without special mention in academic work when it serves only as an assistant for language support or information searching, unless the teacher gives different instructions or the use falls under listed prohibited uses.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: assistant_use_allowed_with_limits
Original evidence
Evidence 1En dehors d’instructions différentes données par l’enseignant et des usages proscrits décrits ci-après, il est autorisé, dans les travaux, d’utiliser l’intelligence artificielle librement et sans mention particulière lorsqu’elle joue le rôle d’assistant : linguistique ... à la recherche d'informations.
Localized display only
Except where a teacher gives different instructions or prohibited uses apply, AI is authorized in work without special mention when it plays an assistant role for language support or information searching.
Ai Tool Treatment
UMONS advises users to rigorously check AI outputs, verify information, and apply critical analysis; the charter says generative AI use should always be accompanied by independent analysis.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_outputs_should_be_checked_and_independently_analyzed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Il est donc essentiel pour les utilisateurs, en tant que garants de la qualité des informations, idées et analyses dans leurs travaux, d'exercer un contrôle rigoureux, de vérifier les informations, d'enrichir et d'appliquer une analyse critique aux productions de l'IA
Localized display only
Users are expected to rigorously check and verify AI outputs and apply critical analysis to them.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
1 source attribution
Charte d’utilisation des systèmes d’intelligence artificielle générative dans les travaux universitaires à l’UMONS
web.umons.ac.be
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.