Policy presence
University of Alberta has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Edmonton, Canada
University of Alberta
University of Alberta is listed as QS 2026 rank =94. University of Alberta has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University of Alberta is listed as QS 2026 rank =94. University of Alberta has 7 source-backed AI policy claim records from 6 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of Alberta as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 14, 2026 and last changed on May 14, 2026. The record contains 7 source-backed claims, including 7 reviewed claims, from 6 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-alberta.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: Gemini.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
University of Alberta has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University of Alberta has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of Alberta has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of Alberta has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of Alberta has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
University of Alberta has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Teaching guidance
University of Alberta has 3 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of Alberta has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
University of Alberta has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Security Review
University of Alberta identifies Gemini via CCID as the institutionally approved generative AI tool for University of Alberta data, while other generative AI tools are not currently authorized for University data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: gemini_via_ccid_institutionally_approved_for_university_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Gemini App is currently the only generative AI platform that has been approved for use with University of Alberta data.
Localized display only
Gemini via CCID is the named institutionally approved generative AI option for university data.
Privacy
University of Alberta's AI Data Safety Guidelines are designed to help users determine what data can be safely shared with AI while complying with university Information Security policies.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: data_safety_guidelines_help_determine_safe_ai_data_sharing_and_information_security_compliance
Original evidence
Evidence 1This document is designed to help you determine what data can be safely shared with AI while ensuring compliance with the University of Alberta's Information Security policies.
Localized display only
The data-safety page says it helps users determine what data can be safely shared with AI while complying with university Information Security policies.
Ai Tool Treatment
University of Alberta's responsible-use AI framework provides guidelines for responsible AI use in learning, teaching, research, administration, and other university-related work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: responsible_use_framework_guidelines_across_learning_teaching_research_administration_university_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1This framework provides guidelines for the responsible use of AI in learning, teaching, research, administration, and other university-related work.
Localized display only
The framework applies across learning, teaching, research, administration, and other university-related work.
Source Status
University of Alberta maintains a public AI landing page that identifies its Framework for the Responsible Use of AI as an interpretive guide.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: public_ai_landing_page_identifies_responsible_use_framework_as_interpretive_guide
Original evidence
Evidence 1The Framework for the Responsible Use of AI at the University of Alberta serves as an interpretive guide
Localized display only
UAlberta describes the Framework for the Responsible Use of AI as an interpretive guide.
Teaching
University of Alberta teaching guidance says instructors or programs determine whether students may use AI in coursework and for what purposes, rather than applying a blanket university-wide yes/no rule.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: course_or_program_level_ai_use_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1At the U of A, instructors or, in some cases, programs determine whether students are permitted to use AI in their coursework, and for what purposes.
Localized display only
AI permissions are framed as course, program, or assessment-specific expectations.
Academic Integrity
University of Alberta student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students that AI rules may vary by instructor, program, course, or assignment and that they should check instructions before submitting work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: students_must_check_course_assignment_ai_expectations
Original evidence
Evidence 1Each instructor, program and even assignment may have different rules on the use of artificial intelligence.
Localized display only
Students are directed to check syllabi and assignment instructions for AI-use expectations.
Research
University of Alberta research-grant-development guidance says researchers must take full responsibility for the originality and accuracy of their proposals.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: researchers_responsible_for_originality_and_accuracy_of_grant_proposals
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers must take full responsibility for the originality and accuracy of their proposals.
Localized display only
The grant-development guidance says researchers must take full responsibility for the originality and accuracy of proposals.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
6 source attribution
Academic Integrity + AI
ualberta.ca
AI in Teaching and Learning
ualberta.ca
Artificial Intelligence Data Safety Guidelines
ualberta.ca
Ethical Considerations and Guidelines on the Use of Gen AI for Grant Development
ualberta.ca
Framework for the Responsible Use of AI at the University of Alberta
ualberta.ca
Using Artificial Intelligence at the U of A
ualberta.ca
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.