Policy presence
University College Cork has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Cork, Ireland
University College Cork
University College Cork is listed as QS 2026 rank 246. University College Cork has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
University College Cork is listed as QS 2026 rank 246. University College Cork has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University College Cork as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-college-cork.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University College Cork has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
University College Cork has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
University College Cork has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University College Cork has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Academic integrity
University College Cork has 5 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University College Cork has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
University College Cork has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
University College Cork has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For UCC taught-programme assessments, academic integrity is breached if students submit GenAI products as their own work without acknowledgement and without authorisation to use GenAI for the task.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorised_unacknowledged_genai_breach
Original evidence
Evidence 1Academic integrity is breached if students submit the products of GenAI as their own work without acknowledgement and without authorisation to use GenAI in fulfilling the task.
Academic Integrity
UCC's academic integrity policy says the University does not sanction use of GenAI detection software for detecting or investigating alleged academic misconduct.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_detection_not_sanctioned
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of GenAI detection software for the detection or investigation of alleged academic misconduct is not sanctioned by the University.
Academic Integrity
UCC's Academic Integrity for Examinations and Assessments Policy applies to work presented or submitted by registered students for examination, assessment, or credit in taught programmes.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: policy_scope_taught_programmes
Original evidence
Evidence 1This policy applies to all work presented or submitted by registered students for examination, assessment, or credit in taught programmes.
Privacy
UCC's GenAI academic integrity toolkit advises educators not to run student work through external AI detector tools that have not been institutionally approved.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: external_ai_detectors_not_for_student_work_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1Educators should not run student work through any AI detector tools that are external to their institution
Teaching
UCC's GenAI academic integrity toolkit says acknowledging when and how GenAI is used is important for transparency about one's own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_acknowledgement_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1it is important that we do acknowledge when and how we use it in order to maintain transparency about our own work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Academic Integrity and use of Gen AI
ucc.ie
Academic Integrity for Examinations and Assessments Policy 2025-2026
ucc.ie
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.