Brussels, Belgium

Universite libre de Bruxelles

Universite libre de Bruxelles is listed as QS 2026 rank =227. Universite libre de Bruxelles has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Short answer

v1 public contract

Universite libre de Bruxelles is listed as QS 2026 rank =227. Universite libre de Bruxelles has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universite libre de Bruxelles as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-libre-de-bruxelles.json. The entity-level confidence is 94%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languagefrPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universite-libre-de-bruxelles.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Privacy claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Teaching claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score85/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence79%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Policy presence

No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI disclosure

Universite libre de Bruxelles has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Approved tools

Universite libre de Bruxelles has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.

AllowedMachine candidateConfidence78%Evidence1Sources1

Named AI services

Universite libre de Bruxelles has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence80%Evidence1Sources1

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Privacy

ULB's 2025-2026 general study regulations tell students not to disclose to AI personal or confidential data other than their own, and not to implicitly grant AI use rights over copyrighted or confidential productions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: student_ai_confidentiality_limit

Original evidence

Evidence 1
l'étudiant veille à la non-divulgation à une IA de données personnelles ou confidentielles autre que celles le concernant

Academic Integrity

ULB's 2025-2026 general study regulations state that student use of personal data contrary to the AI-related confidentiality rules is subject to disciplinary sanction.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_personal_data_misuse_disciplinary_sanction

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Toute utilisation de données à caractère personnel contraire à ces règles est passible de sanction disciplinaire.

Teaching

ULB describes Academ·IA as its institutional plan to train, sensitize, and equip students, teachers, administrative staff, and researchers around responsible and ethical AI culture.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%

Normalized value: institutional_ai_training_plan

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Ce plan a pour objectif de former, de sensibiliser et d'outiller les étudiant.es, les enseignant.es, le personnel administratif (PATGS) et les chercheur.es

Academic Integrity

ULB's 2024 AI-in-teaching note says that students may not use generative AI to perform the task or demonstrate the competence being assessed unless the teacher explicitly authorizes it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: generative_ai_assessment_requires_teacher_authorization

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Les étudiants ne peuvent donc recourir à un tel outil pour effectuer la tâche ou démontrer la compétence sur lesquelles porte l’évaluation concernée. Sauf autorisation explicite par l’enseignant

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 15, 2026Last changedMay 15, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities