Policy presence
Université de Strasbourg has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Strasbourg, France
Université de Strasbourg
Université de Strasbourg is listed as QS 2026 rank =420. Université de Strasbourg has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Université de Strasbourg is listed as QS 2026 rank =420. Université de Strasbourg has 5 source-backed AI policy claim records from 4 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Université de Strasbourg as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universite-de-strasbourg.json. The entity-level confidence is 96%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Université de Strasbourg has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Université de Strasbourg has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Université de Strasbourg has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Université de Strasbourg has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Université de Strasbourg has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Université de Strasbourg has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
Université de Strasbourg has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Unistra's AI guidelines say users must not send personal data, professional documents, or confidential documents to AI systems hosted outside the university when confidentiality cannot be systematically guaranteed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: do_not_send_personal_professional_confidential_data_to_external_ai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Nombre d'informations et de données ne doivent en aucun cas être transmises à des IAs hébergées hors de l'université [...] Il ne faut jamais leur transmettre de données personnelles, ni de documents professionnels et a fortiori de documents confidentiels.
Localized display only
The AI guidelines say personal data, professional documents, and confidential documents should never be sent to AI systems hosted outside the university where confidentiality is not guaranteed.
Academic Integrity
Unistra's general exam regulations state that individual or collective university work must be personal and that plagiarism is excluded, including from documents generated by conversational or writing tools based on artificial intelligence.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_conversational_or_writing_tool_content_included_in_plagiarism_exclusion
Original evidence
Evidence 1Le présent règlement général des examens, commun à l'ensemble des cursus de l'Université de Strasbourg [...] s'impose à l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire. Les travaux universitaires individuels ou collectifs [...] doivent revêtir un caractère personnel, ce qui exclut tout plagiat y compris [...] générés par des outils conversationnels ou rédactionnels à partir d'une intelligence artificielle.
Localized display only
The general exam regulation applies across Unistra curricula and says university work must be personal, excluding plagiarism including from AI conversational or writing tools.
Source Status
Université de Strasbourg's Digital Charter page links AI guidelines as part of the Digital Charter and describes those guidelines as defining conditions for responsible AI use; the page says the charter applies to the whole Unistra community and is mandatory.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: digital_charter_includes_ai_guidelines_mandatory_for_community
Original evidence
Evidence 1La charte comporte... Des lignes directrices sur l'usage des intelligences artificielles [...] définissant les conditions d'une utilisation responsable de ces outils. Cette charte s'applique à l'ensemble de la communauté Unistra et de ses utilisateurs. Elle présente un caractère impératif.
Localized display only
The Digital Charter page says the charter includes AI guidelines defining responsible use conditions and applies mandatorily to the whole Unistra community.
Ai Tool Treatment
Unistra's AI guidelines say authors should indicate when content was partially or fully produced by AI and identify AI-generated passages unambiguously like any borrowed material or external-source citation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_content_should_be_disclosed_and_identified
Original evidence
Evidence 1Afin de concilier bon usage de l'IA et respect du droit de la propriété intellectuelle, l'auteur devra : indiquer que le contenu a été partiellement ou intégralement produit par l'IA ; identifier sans ambiguïté les passages générés par l'IA à l'instar de n'importe quel emprunt ou citation d'une source externe.
Localized display only
The AI guidelines say authors should disclose partially or fully AI-produced content and identify AI-generated passages like any borrowed material or external citation.
Source Status
A June 2025 official Unistra article says the university had not chosen a dedicated AI charter at that time; instead, its Digital Charter was amended with broad principles and more flexible guides could be developed.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_dedicated_ai_charter_as_of_2025_article_digital_charter_guidance_instead
Original evidence
Evidence 1Plusieurs établissements d'enseignement supérieur se sont dotés d'une charte pour l'IA. Un choix qui n'a pour l'heure pas été privilégié à l'Unistra [...] La Charte de bon usage des moyens numériques a été amendée de grands principes [...] Ensuite, on peut imaginer des déclinaisons sous forme de guides, plus évolutifs et contextualisés.
Localized display only
An official 2025 article says Unistra had not chosen a dedicated AI charter, but had amended the Digital Charter with broad principles and could use flexible contextual guides.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
« Outiller les enseignants dans leurs pratiques en matière d'IA »
savoirs.unistra.fr
Charte du numérique de l'Université de Strasbourg
services-numeriques.unistra.fr
Lignes directrices sur l'usage des IAs
documentation.unistra.fr
Règlement général des examens et des concours de l'Université de Strasbourg
chimie.unistra.fr
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.