Ancona, Italy

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Universita' Politecnica delle Marche is listed as QS 2026 rank 801-850.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universita' Politecnica delle Marche as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universita-politecnica-delle-marche.json. The entity-level confidence is 88%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageitPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universita-politecnica-delle-marche.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Research claims.
  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes Source status claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources4

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score60/100Coverage labelmoderate public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence68%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Research

UNIVPM's Research Integrity Charter states that UNIVPM defines and implements clear and transparent policies and procedures for good research practices, suspected research, and research-integrity violations, and provides infrastructure for research data and material generation, management, and protection.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: research integrity charter covers good research practices and data/material management

Original evidence

Evidence 1
UNIVPM definisce e attua politiche e procedure chiare e trasparenti sulle buone prassi da adottare per la conduzione dell'attivita di ricerca e sulla gestione adeguata e trasparente delle ricerche sospette e delle violazioni dell'integrita della ricerca.

Localized display only

UNIVPM defines and implements clear and transparent policies and procedures for good practices in conducting research and for managing suspected research and research-integrity violations.

Academic Integrity

UNIVPM's Code of Ethics rejects scientific misconduct including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and practices that deviate from accepted scientific-community standards, and commits the university community to respect copyright and avoid plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: code of ethics prohibits plagiarism and scientific misconduct

Original evidence

Evidence 1
L'Universita ripudia la cattiva condotta scientifica intesa come la produzione, la falsificazione, il plagio e ogni altra pratica che devia da quelle comunemente accettate dalla comunita scientifica.

Localized display only

The university rejects scientific misconduct understood as fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and other practices that deviate from those commonly accepted by the scientific community.

Research

UNIVPM's Research Ethics Committee regulation says the committee provides opinions, assessments, and checks on request for university research projects and governing bodies, and that the committee's opinions are binding for the requester.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: research ethics committee provides binding opinions for requesters

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Il Comitato ha il compito di fornire, su richiesta, pareri, valutazioni, verifiche alle/ai docenti dell'Ateneo responsabili scientifici di progetti di ricerca, alle/ai ricercatrici/ricercatori ... e agli organi di governo.

Localized display only

The committee is tasked with providing, on request, opinions, assessments, and checks to university faculty responsible for research projects, researchers, and governing bodies.

Source Status

UNIVPM has official statutes/regulations sources for ethics, conduct, and research integrity; this run did not verify a separate university-wide generative-AI teaching, assessment, or student-use policy.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence72%

Normalized value: official governance sources found; no verified AI-specific university-wide policy found

Original evidence

Evidence 1
La sezione contiene: Lo statuto; Il codice etico; I codici di comportamento e disciplinare; Il codice per l'integrita della Ricerca; I regolamenti di ateneo; I riferimenti alla normativa nazionale ed europea.

Localized display only

The section contains the statute, Code of Ethics, codes of conduct and discipline, the Research Integrity Charter, university regulations, and national and European legislation references.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

4 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities