Policy presence
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Madrid, Spain
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =334. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) is listed as QS 2026 rank =334. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 2 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 16, 2026 and last changed on May 16, 2026. The record contains 2 source-backed claims, including 2 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidad-politecnica-de-madrid-upm.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
Approved tools
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
UPM's institutional repository hosts 2025 generative-AI education good-practice guides, but the checked guides state that they are recommendations or author opinions and not official UPM recommendations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official repository guidance with explicit non-official limitation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Estas guías son solo recomendaciones y pistas para integrar la IA en la educación de la mejor manera posible. Expresan la opinión de los autores y no una recomendación oficial de la UPM.
Localized display only
The guide says these are recommendations and author opinions, not an official UPM recommendation.
Source Status
A 2025 UPM institutional-repository good-practice guide suggests a template for course guides to state whether generative AI tools are permitted, restricted, or not permitted; the guide itself says it is a recommendation or author opinion and not an official UPM recommendation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: repository good-practice guide only; not official UPM policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1En la guía docente se podría añadir una sección específica sobre los usos que permitimos hacer de la IA en la asignatura. Esta asignatura [permite/no permite/permite con restricciones] el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial generativa.
Localized display only
The guide suggests adding a course-guide section on permitted, restricted, or prohibited generative-AI use.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
¿Cómo integrar en la guía docente el uso de Inteligencia Artificial? : Guía de Buenas Prácticas
oa.upm.es
Uso ético y responsable de la Inteligencia Artificial en la educación : Guía Buenas Prácticas
oa.upm.es
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.