Madrid, Spain

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage2 reviewedEvidence-backed claims2Reviewed2Candidate0Official sources2Source languageesPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universidad-politecnica-de-madrid-upm.json

Policy profile

Coverage score35/100Coverage labelpartial public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence74%

AI disclosure

No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coursework

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Exams

No source-backed public claim about exam AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Academic integrity

No source-backed public claim about academic-integrity treatment of AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about AI use under academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Named AI services

No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

2 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Source Status

UPM's institutional repository hosts 2025 generative-AI education good-practice guides, but the checked guides state that they are recommendations or author opinions and not official UPM recommendations.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: official repository guidance with explicit non-official limitation

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Estas guías son solo recomendaciones y pistas para integrar la IA en la educación de la mejor manera posible. Expresan la opinión de los autores y no una recomendación oficial de la UPM.

Localized display only

The guide says these are recommendations and author opinions, not an official UPM recommendation.

Source Status

A 2025 UPM institutional-repository good-practice guide suggests a template for course guides to state whether generative AI tools are permitted, restricted, or not permitted; the guide itself says it is a recommendation or author opinion and not an official UPM recommendation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: repository good-practice guide only; not official UPM policy

Original evidence

Evidence 1
En la guía docente se podría añadir una sección específica sobre los usos que permitimos hacer de la IA en la asignatura. Esta asignatura [permite/no permite/permite con restricciones] el uso de herramientas de inteligencia artificial generativa.

Localized display only

The guide suggests adding a course-guide section on permitted, restricted, or prohibited generative-AI use.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities