Medellin, Colombia

Universidad de Antioquia

Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.

Universidad de Antioquia AI policy short answer

v1 public contract

Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Universidad de Antioquia is listed as QS 2026 rank 781-790.

Citation-ready summary

As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidad de Antioquia as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidad-de-antioquia.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.

Claim coverage4 reviewedSource languageesPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/universidad-de-antioquia.json

Policy signals in this record

  • Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
  • Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
  • No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
  • Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
  • Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources1

This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.

This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Policy profile

Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.

Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance states that AI tools must not be used to present automatically generated content as one's own, and that conventional citation systems should be used when referring to that content.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: program_level_ai_generated_content_not_as_own

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Las herramientas de IA no deben emplearse para presentar como propio contenido generado automaticamente. Es obligatorio utilizar sistemas de citacion convencionales, como el estilo APA, al referirse a dicho contenido.

Localized display only

AI tools must not be used to present automatically generated content as one's own; conventional citation systems such as APA should be used when referring to that content.

Academic Integrity

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says academic work using AI should specify the tool name, version, provider, search criteria, AI analysis process, and the role AI played in developing the work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: program_level_ai_work_details_expected

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Todo trabajo en el que haga uso de herramientas de IA debe especificar: el nombre, la version y el proveedor de la herramienta; los criterios de busqueda utilizados; el proceso de analisis llevado a cabo por la IA; y el rol que esta desempenando en el desarrollo del trabajo.

Localized display only

Any work using AI tools should specify the tool name, version, provider, search criteria, AI analysis process, and AI's role in the work.

Academic Integrity

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says AI use in academic products should be explicitly declared, with the declaration placed in the introduction, methodology section, or footnotes.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: program_level_ai_disclosure_expected

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Para garantizar la transparencia, se requiere que el uso de IA en los productos academicos - sean estos videos, textos, imagenes, audios u otros contenidos - sea declarado explicitamente.

Localized display only

To ensure transparency, AI use in academic products should be explicitly declared.

Ai Tool Treatment

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says students and teachers may use AI tools to support academic activities, but those tools should not be used to automatically generate the main writing of assignments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: program_level_ai_support_allowed_not_main_drafting

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Estudiantes y docentes pueden utilizar herramientas de inteligencia artificial para apoyar sus actividades academicas. Sin embargo, estas herramientas no deberian emplearse para la generacion automatica de la redaccion del contenido principal de los trabajos.

Localized display only

Students and teachers may use AI tools to support academic activities, but those tools should not be used to automatically draft the main content of assignments.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.

Official sources

1 source attribution

Change log

Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.

View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.

Last checkedMay 20, 2026Last changedMay 20, 2026Open change log

Corrections and missing evidence

Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.

If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.

Back to universities