Policy presence
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Open, evidence-backed AI policy records for public reuse.
Medellin, Colombia
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 20, 2026.
v1 public contract
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 1 official source attribution, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 20, 2026. Discovery context: Universidad de Antioquia is listed as QS 2026 rank 781-790.
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Universidad de Antioquia as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 20, 2026 and last changed on May 20, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 1 official source attribution. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/universidad-de-antioquia.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Universidad de Antioquia has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Universidad de Antioquia has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Universidad de Antioquia has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Universidad de Antioquia has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Universidad de Antioquia has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: program_level_ai_generated_content_not_as_own
Original evidence
Evidence 1Las herramientas de IA no deben emplearse para presentar como propio contenido generado automaticamente. Es obligatorio utilizar sistemas de citacion convencionales, como el estilo APA, al referirse a dicho contenido.
Localized display only
AI tools must not be used to present automatically generated content as one's own; conventional citation systems such as APA should be used when referring to that content.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: program_level_ai_work_details_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1Todo trabajo en el que haga uso de herramientas de IA debe especificar: el nombre, la version y el proveedor de la herramienta; los criterios de busqueda utilizados; el proceso de analisis llevado a cabo por la IA; y el rol que esta desempenando en el desarrollo del trabajo.
Localized display only
Any work using AI tools should specify the tool name, version, provider, search criteria, AI analysis process, and AI's role in the work.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: program_level_ai_disclosure_expected
Original evidence
Evidence 1Para garantizar la transparencia, se requiere que el uso de IA en los productos academicos - sean estos videos, textos, imagenes, audios u otros contenidos - sea declarado explicitamente.
Localized display only
To ensure transparency, AI use in academic products should be explicitly declared.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: program_level_ai_support_allowed_not_main_drafting
Original evidence
Evidence 1Estudiantes y docentes pueden utilizar herramientas de inteligencia artificial para apoyar sus actividades academicas. Sin embargo, estas herramientas no deberian emplearse para la generacion automatica de la redaccion del contenido principal de los trabajos.
Localized display only
Students and teachers may use AI tools to support academic activities, but those tools should not be used to automatically draft the main content of assignments.
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
1 source attribution
bibliotecadigital.udea.edu.co
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.