Policy presence
No source-backed public AI policy or guidance record is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain a source-backed claim that establishes a policy or guidance source.
Makkah, Saudi Arabia
Umm Al-Qura University
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Umm Al-Qura University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Umm Al-Qura University has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Umm Al-Qura University has 2 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Umm Al-Qura University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Umm Al-Qura University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Umm Al-Qura University has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Named AI services
Umm Al-Qura University has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Umm Al-Qura University has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Umm Al-Qura University journals state that AI tools, including ChatGPT, GPT-4, Google Bard, Claude, and other large language models, cannot be listed as authors in submissions; human authors must disclose any AI use in creating article content.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_ai_no_authorship_disclosure_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1لا يمكن تسجيل أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي (بما في ذلك Chat GPT, GPT-4, Google Bard, Claude ونماذج اللغات الكبيرة الأخرى) كمؤلفين في أي تقديم إلى مجلات جامعة أم القرى. ... يجب تسجيل المؤلفين البشريين فقط الذين يستوفون معايير التأليف، ويجب الإفصاح عن أي استخدام للذكاء الاصطناعي في صناعة محتوى الورقة العلمية.
Localized display only
Umm Al-Qura University journals state that AI tools cannot be listed as authors, and that human authors must disclose AI use in creating article content.
Privacy
For Umm Al-Qura University journals, reviewers are told not to use AI tools to generate, summarize, or draft confidential peer-review reports, and to avoid uploading confidential research content to third-party AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: journal_reviewers_no_ai_for_confidential_peer_review
Original evidence
Evidence 1يجب على المحكمين عدم استخدام أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي لإنشاء، أو تلخيص، أو صياغة مسودات المراجعة التحكيمية السرية. ... يجب على المحكمين تجنب: إرفاق محتوى البحوث السرية في أدوات الذكاء الاصطناعي ذات الطرف الثالث.
Localized display only
The journal policy says reviewers should not use AI tools to create, summarize, or draft confidential peer-review reports and should avoid uploading confidential research content to third-party AI tools.
Academic Integrity
Umm Al-Qura University's IT and E-Learning Deanship defines academic integrity in digital education and identifies cheating, plagiarism, improper collaboration, impersonation, assistance, and falsification as forms of academic dishonesty; it says students are expected to recognize plagiarism and ensure submitted assessments are their own work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: digital_education_academic_integrity
Original evidence
Evidence 1هناك عدة أنواع من الأفعال التي تعتبر مسيئة لمعايير الصدق الأكاديمي؛ من بينها الغش، والانتحال، والتعاون غير اللائق، وانتحال الهوية، والمساعدة، والتزييف والتزوير. ... من المتوقع أن يتعرف الطلاب على الانتحال وطرق تجنبه، لذلك يجب على الطالب التأكد من أن جميع التقييمات المقدمة من قبله هي من مجهوده الخاص.
Localized display only
The page lists cheating, plagiarism, improper collaboration, impersonation, assistance, falsification, and forgery as academic dishonesty, and says students should ensure submitted assessments are their own work.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
سياسات النزاهة الأكاديمية في التعليم الرقمي - عمادة تقنية المعلومات والتعليم الإلكتروني - وكالة الجامعة للشؤون الأكاديمية | جامعة أم القرى
uqu.edu.sa
سياسة الذكاء الاصطناعي - مجلة جامعة أم القرى للعلوم التربوية والنفسية - ادارة الجمعيات العلمية | جامعة أم القرى
uqu.edu.sa