Policy presence
Sultan Qaboos University has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Muscat, Oman
Sultan Qaboos University
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Sultan Qaboos University has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Sultan Qaboos University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Sultan Qaboos University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Sultan Qaboos University has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Sultan Qaboos University has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Teaching guidance
Sultan Qaboos University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Incorrect AI use is treated as academic misconduct under SQU academic misconduct handling.
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you use AI tools incorrectly, it is considered academic misconduct. If your teachers think you used AI incorrectly for an assignment, they will follow the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy to decide if it is plagiarism.
Academic Integrity
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who intend to use generative AI in their work to discuss this with their teacher and cite the use of AI tools in the work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Students intending to use GenAI should discuss it with the teacher and cite AI tool use.
Original evidence
Evidence 1If you intend to use generative AI in your work, discuss this with your teacher. He or she will need to know which tools you plan to use and for what purpose. Cite the use of AI tools in your work using in-text references and your reference list.
Academic Integrity
Sultan Qaboos University's Centre for Preparatory Studies guidance says students may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to enhance learning, but they remain expected to produce original work and should check with their teacher before using generative AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: GenAI may support learning; students expected to produce original work and check with teacher before use.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI tools like Chat GPT can be used to enhance learning, but they do not replace independent learning. You are expected to produce original work. ... You should always check with your teacher before using generative AI.
Teaching
The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who use generative AI to carefully check its facts and claims and to read, understand, and critically evaluate AI-generated content before using it for ideas, information, structure, or language.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Students should critically evaluate AI-generated content before using it.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Generative AI sometimes creates untrue information. If you use generative AI to help you write, you must carefully check all its facts and claims. ... you must read, understand and critically evaluate the AI-generated content before using it for ideas, information, structure or language.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
1 source attribution
Academic Integrity Guide for Students
elearn.squ.edu.om