Policy presence
Sapienza University of Rome has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Rome, Italy
Sapienza University of Rome
Sapienza University of Rome is listed as QS 2026 rank 128. Sapienza University of Rome has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Sapienza University of Rome is listed as QS 2026 rank 128. Sapienza University of Rome has 4 source-backed AI policy claim records from 2 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Sapienza University of Rome as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 14, 2026 and last changed on May 14, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/sapienza-university-of-rome.json. The entity-level confidence is 91%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT, Gemini.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Sapienza University of Rome has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Sapienza University of Rome has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Sapienza University of Rome has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
Sapienza University of Rome has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: required.
Academic integrity
Sapienza University of Rome has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
Sapienza University of Rome has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Named AI services
Sapienza University of Rome has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: final_paper_originality_declaration_ai_transparency_no_substantial_generation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Qualora siano stati utilizzati strumenti di intelligenza artificiale, traduttori automatici, correttori grammaticali o software per l'analisi di dati, la loro funzione è stata dichiarata in modo trasparente all'interno dell'elaborato, insieme al loro utilizzo specifico; Non ho impiegato strumenti di intelligenza artificiale per generare parti sostanziali del contenuto o per automatizzare la redazione di nessuna delle sezioni dell'elaborato.
Localized display only
The declaration requires transparent disclosure of AI or related tools and states that AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.
Ai Tool Treatment
For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: psychology_undergraduate_final_paper_ai_support_transparent_personal_revision
Original evidence
Evidence 1L'uso dell'intelligenza artificiale generativa (IA) attraverso piattaforme quali ChatGPT, Gemini e servizi analoghi, può rappresentare un valido supporto durante la stesura, ma richiede un utilizzo attento, consapevole delle sue limitazioni e condotto con la massima trasparenza.
Localized display only
For CAD Psychology final papers, Sapienza says generative AI can support drafting but requires careful, limitation-aware, transparent use.
Academic Integrity
For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: psychology_undergraduate_final_paper_illicit_ai_uses_listed
Original evidence
Evidence 1Sono considerati utilizzi illeciti dell'IA ai fini della redazione dell'elaborato di prova finale i seguenti comportamenti: Cercare articoli e altre fonti bibliografiche; Usare citazioni non verificate; Riassumere articoli; Generare la struttura dell'elaborato o l'indice; Evitare l'analisi critica; Delegare la scrittura; Manipolare dati; Generare risultati falsi; Plagio.
Localized display only
The guidance lists multiple illicit AI uses for the final paper, including bibliography discovery, unverified citations, summaries, delegated writing, data manipulation, fake results, and plagiarism.
Academic Integrity
The Sapienza CAD Psychology final-paper guidance says students must attach a dated and signed Declaration of Originality and Academic Integrity to the final paper.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: psychology_undergraduate_final_paper_originality_integrity_declaration_required
Original evidence
Evidence 1In tal senso, l* student* deve allegare a margine dell'elaborato (debitamente datata e firmata) la “Dichiarazione di Originalità e Integrità Accademica dell'Elaborato di Prova Finale”, assumendosi la piena responsabilità dell'originalità e dell'integrità del prodotto presentato.
Localized display only
The CAD Psychology guidance requires a dated and signed final-paper originality and academic-integrity declaration.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Dichiarazione di Originalità e Integrità Accademica dell'Elaborato Finale
corsidilaurea.uniroma1.it
Linee guida per la stesura della prova finale triennale
corsidilaurea.uniroma1.it
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.