University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Sapienza University of Rome

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 14, 2026Last changedMay 14, 2026Claims4Sources2Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Sapienza University of Rome currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Sapienza University of Rome. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Sapienza University of Rome combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+8-0
11 # Sapienza University of Rome AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.
3+Evidence (it, 5c59ef832f3e): Qualora siano stati utilizzati strumenti di intelligenza artificiale, traduttori automatici, correttori grammaticali o software per l'analisi di dati, la loro funzione è stata dichiarata in modo trasparente all'interno dell'elaborato, insieme al loro utilizzo specifico; Non ho impiegato strumenti di intelligenza artificiale per generare parti sostanziali del contenuto o per automatizzare la redazione di nessuna delle sezioni dell'elaborato.
4+ai_tool_treatment: For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.
5+Evidence (it, 45e68f65f404): L'uso dell'intelligenza artificiale generativa (IA) attraverso piattaforme quali ChatGPT, Gemini e servizi analoghi, può rappresentare un valido supporto durante la stesura, ma richiede un utilizzo attento, consapevole delle sue limitazioni e condotto con la massima trasparenza.
6+academic_integrity: For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.
7+Evidence (it, 45e68f65f404): Sono considerati utilizzi illeciti dell'IA ai fini della redazione dell'elaborato di prova finale i seguenti comportamenti: Cercare articoli e altre fonti bibliografiche; Usare citazioni non verificate; Riassumere articoli; Generare la struttura dell'elaborato o l'indice; Evitare l'analisi critica; Delegare la scrittura; Manipolare dati; Generare risultati falsi; Plagio.
8+academic_integrity: The Sapienza CAD Psychology final-paper guidance says students must attach a dated and signed Declaration of Originality and Academic Integrity to the final paper.
9+Evidence (it, 45e68f65f404): In tal senso, l* student* deve allegare a margine dell'elaborato (debitamente datata e firmata) la “Dichiarazione di Originalità e Integrità Accademica dell'Elaborato di Prova Finale”, assumendosi la piena responsabilità dell'originalità e dell'integrità del prodotto presentato.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

4 claim records

academic_integrity

Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesit

ai_tool_treatment

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesit

academic_integrity

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesit

academic_integrity

The Sapienza CAD Psychology final-paper guidance says students must attach a dated and signed Declaration of Originality and Academic Integrity to the final paper.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesit

Source snapshots

2 source attributions