Policy presence
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Taipei City, Taiwan
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
Taiwan Tech's Computer Center tells teachers and staff not to provide generative AI tools with official confidential information, personal information, or information not approved by the university for public disclosure, and not to ask AI questions that may involve confidential business or personal data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Generative AI security guidance prohibits inputting confidential, personal, or non-public university information.
Original evidence
Evidence 1不得向AI提供涉及公務應保密、個人及未經本校同意公開之資訊；亦不得向AI詢問可能涉及機密業務或個人資料之問題。
Localized display only
Do not provide AI with official confidential information, personal information, or university information not approved for public disclosure; also do not ask AI questions that may involve confidential business or personal data.
Source Status
Taiwan Tech's student academic-ethics case-handling rules are an official general academic-ethics source defining violations such as plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, ghostwriting, intellectual-property infringement, and other cheating; the checked rule is not AI-specific.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: general academic-ethics source only; not AI-specific policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1二、本要點所稱違反學術倫理，指有下列情形之一者：(一)論文、作品、成就證明、書面報告、技術報告或專業實務報告中有抄襲、剽竊、造假、變造、由他人代寫、侵犯他人智慧財產權或其他舞弊情事。(二)其他違反學術倫理情事。
Localized display only
The rules define academic-ethics violations to include plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, ghostwriting by another person, intellectual-property infringement, other cheating, and other academic-ethics violations.
Teaching
Taiwan Tech's Center for Teaching and Learning Development recommends that instructors introduce generative AI before class and state in the syllabus which tools students may use, which tools are restricted, and the reasons for restrictions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Teaching guidance recommends course-level communication and syllabus disclosure of allowed and restricted AI tools.
Original evidence
Evidence 1課程溝通：在課前介紹以及教學大綱明訂可允許學生使用哪些工具及哪些為限制的工具並述明限制的原因。
Localized display only
Course communication: before class, explain and specify in the syllabus which tools students may use, which are restricted, and the reasons for the restrictions.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
3 source attribution
【資安/Security】使用生成式 AI 工具時，請勿提供個資或業務機敏資訊。
cc.ntust.edu.tw
【重要公告】生成式AI (Generative AI)簡介與教學策略調整建議方針
ctld.ntust.edu.tw
國立臺灣科技大學學生違反學術倫理案件處理要點
academic.ntust.edu.tw