Policy presence
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
St. John's, Canada
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Memorial University of Newfoundland AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Memorial University of Newfoundland is listed as QS 2026 rank =660.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Memorial University of Newfoundland as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/memorial-university-of-newfoundland.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Security review claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
Memorial University of Newfoundland has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Memorial University's 2025-2026 University Calendar lists submission of work created through unauthorized use of generative AI tools and presented as a student's original work as an academic offence.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: unauthorized_generative_ai_submission_academic_offence
Original evidence
Evidence 1Use of generative artificial intelligence (AI): The submission of work that has been created through the unauthorized use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools and presented as a student’s original work.
Security Review
Memorial CIO guidance says university data should be handled with AI tools that are approved or recommended by the university, and users should avoid uploading sensitive or confidential data to unsecured AI platforms.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: approved_recommended_ai_tools_for_university_data_avoid_sensitive_confidential_uploads
Original evidence
Evidence 1When using university data, use AI tools that are approved or recommended by the university. Avoid uploading sensitive or confidential data to unsecure AI platforms.
Localized display only
When using university data, use university-approved or recommended AI tools and avoid uploading sensitive or confidential data to unsecured AI platforms.
Ai Tool Treatment
Memorial Libraries' AI academic work guide says students must acknowledge any AI-generated content used in academic work and are not permitted to present work created through unauthorized generative AI tools as their own original work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: acknowledge_ai_generated_content_and_no_unauthorized_genai_as_own_work
Original evidence
Evidence 1Therefore, you must acknowledge any use of AI-generated content in your academic work. You are not permitted to create work using unauthorized generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools and present it as your own original work.
Localized display only
Students must acknowledge AI-generated content used in academic work and may not present work created through unauthorized generative AI tools as their own original work.
Teaching
Memorial's Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning presents GenAI as a teaching and learning support area and offers instructor consultations and department-level presentations on appropriate GenAI use in course development.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: citl_genai_teaching_and_course_development_support
Original evidence
Evidence 1CITL's Educational Developers, Senior Instructional Designers and Instructional Designers can provide guidance on assessment design and the appropriate use of GenAI in course development activities.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
6.12 Academic Misconduct | 2025-2026 University Calendar
mun.ca
Artificial intelligence (AI) and your academic work
library.mun.ca
Generative AI | Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning
mun.ca
Guidance for GenAI Usage | Office of the Chief Information Officer
mun.ca
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.