Policy presence
Bar-Ilan University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Ramat Gan, Israel
Bar-Ilan University
Bar-Ilan University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 5 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Bar-Ilan University AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Bar-Ilan University has 5 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 5 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Bar-Ilan University is listed as QS 2026 rank =660.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Bar-Ilan University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 5 source-backed claims, including 5 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/bar-ilan-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
- Teaching, assessment, coursework, or syllabus-related language appears in the public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Bar-Ilan University has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Bar-Ilan University has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Exams
Bar-Ilan University has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Bar-Ilan University has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Bar-Ilan University has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Bar-Ilan University has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Bar-Ilan University has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Bar-Ilan University has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Bar-Ilan University guidance requires students to declare whether they used generative AI tools in an assignment and to explain the specific contribution made by GenAI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: mandatory_genai_use_declaration_for_assignments
Original evidence
Evidence 1Students are required to declare whether they have used generative AI tools in the assignment in question. Such a declaration shall also elaborate what specific contribution GenAI made to the final product.
Localized display only
Students must declare GenAI use in the assignment and explain GenAI contribution.
Ai Tool Treatment
Bar-Ilan University guidance leaves whether and how students may use generative AI tools to instructor discretion; if an instructor has not explicitly prohibited use, use is permitted by default when the student explicitly discloses all use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: instructor_discretion_default_permitted_with_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Bar-Ilan leaves to the full discretion of instructors the decision on whether to allow the use of GenAI tools and the extent to which such use is permitted. If an instructor has not explicitly prohibited the use of generative AI tools, its usage shall be, by default, permitted, provided the student has explicitly disclosed all manners of use.
Localized display only
Instructor discretion controls whether and how GenAI is allowed; absent an explicit prohibition, use is default-permitted if disclosed.
Ai Tool Treatment
Bar-Ilan University guidance says students are responsible for the content they submit after using artificial intelligence, including errors introduced by hallucination or inaccuracy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_responsible_for_ai_generated_content_accuracy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Content created through the use of artificial intelligence must undergo editing and self-scrutiny by the student to verify its accuracy and suitability to academic requirements. Students submitting such work are responsible for all its content, including errors introduced by AI hallucination or inaccuracy.
Localized display only
Students must edit/check AI-created content and remain responsible for errors, including hallucinations.
Privacy
Bar-Ilan University guidance instructs users not to disclose personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms and says generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan data security guidelines.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: no_personal_sensitive_disclosure_and_data_security_guidelines_apply
Original evidence
Evidence 1Privacy protection: It is imperative to refrain from disclosing and sharing personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms. They are to be used in a manner that respects the privacy of all involved. Attached is Bar-Ilan University’s privacy protection policy: https://ict.biu.ac.il/Privacyprotection Data security: Generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan’s data security guidelines, as specified in the data security policy documents:
Localized display only
The guidance bars sharing personal/sensitive information with GenAI platforms and applies BIU data-security guidance to GenAI tools.
Academic Integrity
Bar-Ilan University guidance states that disciplinary decisions for prohibited use of generative AI tools follow the student disciplinary code and are treated as comparable academic-integrity violations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: prohibited_genai_use_treated_under_academic_integrity_discipline
Original evidence
Evidence 1Disciplinary decisions on violations pertaining to prohibited use of generative AI tools shall be in accordance with the Bar-Ilan Disciplinary Code of Conduct and shall be treated as if they were a comparable violation of academic integrity.
Localized display only
Prohibited GenAI use is handled under the disciplinary code as a comparable academic-integrity violation.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Guidance for Appropriate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (GenAI)
graduate-school.biu.ac.il
Guidance for Appropriate Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools (GenAI) | School of Graduate Studies
graduate-school.biu.ac.il
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.