University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

St. Louis, United States

Washington University in St. Louis

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 167Updated27 lip 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

8 reviewed claims

Prywatność

WashU IT guidance says users should not enter Washington University or secure data, including deidentified healthcare data, into publicly accessible non-protected AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność98%

Wartość znormalizowana: no_secure_data_in_public_ai_tools

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
The university supports and encourages the responsible and secure exploration of AI tools. When using any publicly accessible, non-protected AI tools, it is vitally important that you do not enter any Washington University or secure data, including deidentified healthcare data of any kind, into these platforms.

Widok lokalny only

WashU IT warns users not to enter university or secure data into public non-protected AI tools.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
5b8a9f00…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Introductory IT guidance

Academic Integrity

WashU student-facing AI guidance tells students to check the instructor and syllabus about whether and how AI tools may be used for classwork, and says that if no explicit policy is outlined, it is better to assume AI use is banned.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: students_should_clarify_class_ai_policy

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
In regard to your classwork, please check with your instructor and the syllabus about whether and how you can use ChatGPT and other tools to help you with your classwork. Ask the instructor how AI tools are or are not to be used in the class. There is no set policy across instructors as they are also figuring out how AI fits into the future of their disciplines and how best to teach you the skills needed for future professions. If there is no explicit policy outlined, it is better to assume that AI use is banned.

Widok lokalny only

The CTL student guide says students should check their instructor and syllabus, and assume AI use is banned if no explicit policy is outlined.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
6409bee9…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
The Use of ChatGPT in Academic Settings

Academic Integrity

WashU CTL student guidance says students should not represent AI-tool output as their own work and should cite AI contributions when using AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_output_requires_attribution_not_own_work

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Never take the output from AI tools and represent it as your own work. This not only violates the Terms of Use for most AI tools, creating a legal issue, but is also clearly and unarguably plagiarism. To avoid plagiarism when you use AI tools, make sure you cite its contribution accordingly when you use it.

Widok lokalny only

The CTL guide warns not to submit AI output as one's own work and tells students to cite AI contributions.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
6409bee9…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Understanding Academic Integrity with AI

Zamówienia publiczne

WashU IT AI purchasing guidance says an Office of Information Security Vendor Security Review is required when an AI tool has not yet been approved and the user intends to use or purchase it.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: unapproved_ai_tool_vendor_security_review_required

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
If the AI tool has not yet been approved and you intend to use or purchase it, an OIS Vendor Security Review is required. This review evaluates privacy, security, compliance, and AI-specific risks, including how university data is accessed, processed, stored, or used for model training.

Widok lokalny only

WashU IT says unapproved AI tools require an OIS Vendor Security Review before use or purchase.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
5b8a9f00…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
AI Tool Usage and Purchasing Guidance > Step 3

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Washington University in St. Louis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat","description":"WashU IT states that Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is offered in a free version for WashU users, alongside a full licensed version.","howToObtain":"Use the free Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat version or a full Microsoft 365 Copilot licence as applicable.","costToUser":"A free Copilot Chat version is listed; full-licence cost is not specified by this source.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"not_specified"}

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 lip 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 lip 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat enhances the AI assistant's capabilities for all WashU users—whether they have a full Copilot for Microsoft 365 license or are using the free Microsoft 365 Copilot chat version. Users with the free Copilot Chat license have basic access to GPT-5 via Copilot Chat and desktop app.

Widok lokalny only

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat enhances the AI assistant's capabilities for all WashU users—whether they have a full Copilot for Microsoft 365 license or are using the free Microsoft 365 Copilot chat version. Users with the free Copilot Chat license have basic access to GPT-5 via Copilot Chat and desktop app.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
f60b783e…
Pobrano
16 lip 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

WashU identifies specific secure AI tools as reviewed and approved for use with sensitive information, including HIPAA- or FERPA-covered data.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%

Wartość znormalizowana: secure_ai_tools_approved_for_hipaa_ferpa

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Secure AI Tools Approved for HIPAA/FERPA data. Specific tools have been reviewed and approved for use with sensitive information, including data covered by HIPAA or FERPA.

Widok lokalny only

WashU IT labels secure AI tools as approved for HIPAA/FERPA data after review.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
5b8a9f00…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
AI Tools > Secure AI Tools

Nauczanie

WashU CTL course-policy guidance presents multiple possible GenAI policy categories for instructors, including allowed without restriction, allowed with citations, partially restricted, and completely restricted.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%

Wartość znormalizowana: course_ai_policy_options

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
There are many possible approaches to policies on the use of GenAI in a course. Your policies can also vary within a course by assignment or assignment type. The sections below describe potential policy types and offer examples of syllabus language for each type. AI Usage Level: Allowed Without Restriction; Allowed With Citations; Restricted Partially; Restricted Completely.

Widok lokalny only

The CTL page frames course AI policy as instructor-set and lists four possible policy categories.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
8a981638…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Overview table

Source Status

The WashU+AI hub tells students that responsible generative-AI use includes reviewing course expectations for authorized use and seeking clarification from instructors before using generative AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: washu_ai_hub_student_clarification

Ostatnio sprawdzono
15 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
15 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Students: Please ensure the responsible use of generative AI by reviewing your course expectations for the authorized use of generative AI. It is your responsibility to seek clarification from your instructor prior to using these or any other generative AI tools.

Widok lokalny only

The WashU+AI hub tells students to review course expectations and seek instructor clarification before using generative AI tools.

Język źródła
English (en-US)
Skrót migawki
4911c471…
Pobrano
15 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Accessing Generative AI Tools at WashU

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

6 sources

Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Information Technology

it.wustl.edu

Suma kontrolna migawki
5b8a9f00…

Welcome to WashU Artificial Intelligence - Artificial Intelligence

ai.wustl.edu

Suma kontrolna migawki
4911c471…
Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność98%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Washington University in St. Louis AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/washington-university-in-st-louis

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian