Policy presence
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Charlotte, United States
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 6 reviewed claims. Last checked May 25, 2026.
University of North Carolina at Charlotte AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 6 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 6 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 25, 2026. Discovery context: University of North Carolina at Charlotte is listed as QS 2026 rank 1001-1200.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists University of North Carolina at Charlotte as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 25, 2026 and last changed on May 25, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/university-of-north-carolina-at-charlotte.json. The entity-level confidence is 97%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Procurement claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Disclosure, acknowledgment, citation, or attribution language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 2 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: allowed.
Exams
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 1 source-backed public claim for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
University of North Carolina at Charlotte has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
UNC Charlotte OneIT's AI security checklist instructs users not to enter confidential or legally restricted data, including FERPA, HIPAA, PCI, or Level 3 data, into an AI tool.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Confidential, legally restricted, and Level 3 data should not be entered into AI tools.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Protect UNC Charlotte's confidential information and your own. Do not enter confidential or legally restricted data (e.g., personnel records or data protected by FERPA, HIPAA, PCI etc.) or any data that Charlotte's data classification policy identifies as level 3 into an AI tool.
Procurement
UNC Charlotte OneIT states that all non-campus-wide AI software, including free and research-related requests, must use the Software & IT-Related Request Form.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Non-campus-wide AI software requires Software & IT-Related Request Form review.
Original evidence
Evidence 1This list provides guidance on using campus-wide, specialized, and popular AI software with university data. All non-campus-wide software, including free and research-related requests, must fill out the Software & IT-Related Request Form.
Ai Tool Treatment
UNC Charlotte OneIT rates some campus AI tools as approved for use with data handling guidelines, while AI detection software and AI grading software are listed as Do Not Use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: OneIT AI software list uses approved, caution, and do-not-use ratings.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The green circle indicates approved, and the software is approved for use while following the data handling guidelines; a campus agreement is in place with approved data security and privacy policies. ... AI Detection Software Do Not Use ... AI Grading Software Do Not Use.
Source Status
UNC Charlotte's Center for Teaching and Learning says its AI syllabus guide provides flexible course-level examples and does not provide or use a university-created AI policy.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: CTL AI syllabus guide is course-level guidance, not institution-level AI policy.
Original evidence
Evidence 1This guide does NOT provide or use a university-created policy on AI. ... The examples below are course level examples of AI guidelines focused on the use of AI use integrated into coursework. The examples below do not reflect current or future institution level, or department level policy on AI use.
Teaching
UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution recommends that faculty clearly communicate what AI use is permitted in courses, academic exercises, or assessments, and identifies written notice about how and when AI tools may be used as a best practice.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Faculty best practice is written communication of permitted AI use.
Original evidence
Evidence 1To support academic integrity and meaningful learning, faculty should clearly communicate what kind of AI use is permitted in their courses or in particular academic exercises or assessments. ... As a best practice, faculty members should notify students, in writing, about how and when AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) may be used in their assignments, exams, and other course work.
Academic Integrity
UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution provides assignment and exam sample language stating that, where AI use is permitted, transparency is required and failure to disclose AI use may be considered a Code of Student Academic Integrity violation.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Sample assignment language treats undisclosed AI use as a possible academic integrity violation when disclosure is required.
Original evidence
Evidence 1You are permitted, but not required, to use AI tools (such as Copilot or Gemini) to support your learning and productivity on this assignment. However, transparency is required, and failure to disclose AI use may be considered a violation of the Code of Student Academic Integrity.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
AI Software Guidance
oneit.charlotte.edu
Artificial Intelligence
accountability.charlotte.edu
Security Checklist
oneit.charlotte.edu
Syllabus Guidelines on the Use of AI Tools
teaching.charlotte.edu
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.