University AI Policy Tracker

Otwarte, oparte na dowodach rekordy polityk AI uczelni do publicznego uzycia.

APIGitHub
Jezyk
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Université PSL

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 11, 2026Last changedMay 11, 2026Claims5Sources2Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Université PSL currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 11, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Université PSL. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Université PSL combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Université PSL AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Université PSL academic regulations state that, when an instructor authorizes the use of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, that use must be explicitly disclosed like a source citation; failure to disclose AI use is considered plagiarism and sanctioned as such.
3+Evidence (fr, 0b598829da3c): Lorsque celui-ci est autorisé par l’enseignante ou l’enseignant, le recours à des outils basés sur l’intelligence artificielle (IA), tels que ChatGPT, doit être signalé explicitement (de la même manière que toute référence ou citation de source). Ne pas signaler l’utilisation de l’intelligence artificielle est considéré comme un acte de plagiat et sera sanctionné comme tel.
4+academic_integrity: PSL-affiliated guidance recommends researchers be transparent about AI use by indicating the tool used, its version, and the context of use, and notes that the prompt and result can also be documented.
5+Evidence (fr, c8d14b8e1a71): Être transparent dans son utilisation de l’IA?: si une IA générative est utilisée, il faut indiquer l’outil utilisé, sa version et le cadre de cette utilisation. Le prompt et le résultat peuvent également être documentés. Il faut toutefois garder à l’esprit la nature aléatoire des IA, qui rend difficile la reproductibilité de la recherche.
6+academic_integrity: PSL-affiliated guidance states that generative AI tools cannot be considered co-authors of scientific work, and users retain full responsibility for AI-generated content, codes, images, and texts.
7+Evidence (fr, c8d14b8e1a71): Conserver la responsabilité des productions scientifiques issues des IA?: il faut garder une approche critique de ces outils, connaître leurs biais et leurs limites (hallucinations, approximation), ne pas les considérer comme des co-auteurs et ne pas les utiliser pour créer des matériaux scientifiques, qui pourraient être falsifiés.
8+privacy: PSL-affiliated guidance advises that personal data should not be shared with third parties when generative AI is used, and that generated text should be checked so it does not constitute plagiarism or contain personal data.
9+Evidence (fr, c8d14b8e1a71): Outre les questions de confidentialité des productions scientifiques, les données personnelles n’ont pas vocation à être partagées avec des tiers. Dans le cadre des réponses obtenues, il faut vérifier que le texte généré ne constitue pas un plagiat ou ne contient pas de données personnelles.
10+other: PSL-affiliated guidance notes that generative AI can undermine research reproducibility because its codes and algorithms may be unknown and change regularly, and because probabilistic generation can produce variable responses.
11+Evidence (fr, c8d14b8e1a71): La reproductibilité de la recherche est un principe de base de l’intégrité scientifique. Or ce principe est mis à mal par l’utilisation de l’IA. D’une part, les IA génératives utilisent parfois des codes et des algorithmes qui ne sont pas toujours connus et qui connaissent des changements réguliers. Dans ces cas-là, il est impossible de documenter sa recherche pour permettre de la reproduire. D’autre part, au-delà de cette opacité, le caractère probabiliste de la génération conduit à une variabilité des réponses, qui peuvent être différentes d’une interrogation reconduite à différents moments.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

academic_integrity

Université PSL academic regulations state that, when an instructor authorizes the use of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, that use must be explicitly disclosed like a source citation; failure to disclose AI use is considered plagiarism and sanctioned as such.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesfr

other

PSL-affiliated guidance notes that generative AI can undermine research reproducibility because its codes and algorithms may be unknown and change regularly, and because probabilistic generation can produce variable responses.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesfr

privacy

PSL-affiliated guidance advises that personal data should not be shared with third parties when generative AI is used, and that generated text should be checked so it does not constitute plagiarism or contain personal data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

PSL-affiliated guidance states that generative AI tools cannot be considered co-authors of scientific work, and users retain full responsibility for AI-generated content, codes, images, and texts.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%Evidence1Languagesfr

academic_integrity

PSL-affiliated guidance recommends researchers be transparent about AI use by indicating the tool used, its version, and the context of use, and notes that the prompt and result can also be documented.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesfr

Source snapshots

2 source attributions

Utiliser l'intelligence artificielle dans sa recherche : des recommandations pour le respect de l'intégrité scientifique

official_pdf Tracker checked at May 11, 2026, 9:45 AM

Snapshot hash
c8d14b8e1a715d3bbc3bb0cce9e0ed8062cad25acf9c8ee9d5570160651bfb9d