Policy presence
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
San Antonio, United States
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Texas at San Antonio has 4 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
5 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Teaching
Normalized value: Faculty guide advises course-level AI-use expectations in syllabus and course homepage.
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1Faculty are responsible for their syllabus and courses. Because faculty may choose different approaches for generative AI, clearly state in the syllabus and the course homepage whether and how you are allowing the use of AI.
Source Status
Normalized value: Official UTSA AI hub links student and faculty AI resources.
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1AI resources created by UT San Antonio ... For UT San Antonio Students ... AI Essentials: Guidelines and Approaches ... For UT San Antonio Faculty ... Using Generative AI in Teaching, Learning and Research.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: Microsoft Copilot identified in faculty guide as only UTSA-approved AI tool; avoid private data in any LLM.
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1Faculty, staff and students can use the Microsoft CoPilot license to get started with generative AI. This is the only UTSA-approved AI tool because it offers the power of GPT-4 ... with Microsoft’s stringent commercial data protection ... Users should be careful to avoid sharing private data to any LLM.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: AI detection results should not be the sole basis for academic-integrity handling under the faculty guide.
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1AI detection tools ... are inherently imperfect and prone to false positives and false negatives. Relying solely on detection tools can lead to inaccuracies ... To uphold academic integrity, we emphasize following the established processes and guidelines outlined in the university's code of conduct.
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: UTSA Libraries AI guide tells users to fact-check AI and cite AI when used as source or content generator.
Oorspronkelijk bewijs
Evidence 1Fact-check: AI can generate false information. Verify with additional sources. ... Acknowledgement: If you use AI as a source or as a content generator, it needs to be cited in your work.
0 machine or needs-review claim
5 source attribution
provost.utsa.edu
libguides.utsa.edu
provost.utsa.edu
provost.utsa.edu
provost.utsa.edu