University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Bangalore, India

Indian Institute of Science

RanglijstQS World University Rankings 2026: =219Updated15 mei 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

3 reviewed claims

Privacy

IISc faculty-facing AI guidance says entering data into an open AI tool should be treated like posting it publicly unless there are strong reasons to trust the tool, and says not to input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: do_not_input_sensitive_confidential_restricted_information

Laatst gecontroleerd
15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Hence, entering data into an AI tool should be regarded as equivalent to posting it in public (unless there are strong reasons to trust that a specific tool will not use your queries). Do not enter, contribute, or otherwise input sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The faculty presentation warns against entering sensitive, confidential, or restricted information into open AI tools.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
704962d4…
Opgehaald
15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Private and Confidential information slide

Onderzoek

The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%

Genormaliseerde waarde: research_disclosure_recommended

Laatst gecontroleerd
15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Use of generative AI should be fully disclosed, with attribution that is precise, transparent, and with adequate details. In particular, when one is using generative AI in publications, one should follow the guidelines of the Journal, Conference, or Publisher. For thesis and other Institute documents, one should follow the guidelines for publications given below.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The report recommends detailed disclosure and attribution for generative AI use in publications, theses, and other Institute documents.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
711c2189…
Opgehaald
15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section 6, Disclosure and Attribution

Onderwijs

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%

Genormaliseerde waarde: recommended_default_allowed_with_attribution

Laatst gecontroleerd
15 mei 2026
Laatst gewijzigd
15 mei 2026

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
We recommend allowed with attribution as the default institutional policy. This default policy should be articulated via an appropriate channel, such as the Student Handbook. Furthermore, this default policy can be tailored at each level in the hierarchy: individual course instructor, department, division, or programme.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The committee recommends an allowed-with-attribution default for coursework AI use, with tailoring by instructors or academic units.

Brontaal
English (en)
Snapshot-hash
711c2189…
Opgehaald
15 mei 2026
Bewijslocator
Section 5.3, Transparent and Simple Course Policies

Source record

Officiële bronnen

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen94%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Indian Institute of Science AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 15, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/indian-institute-of-science

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen