academic_integrity
VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Wijzigingslogboek
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Samenvatting wijzigingen
Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.
Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.
Diff-categorieën
Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.
Gecombineerd releasediff
Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) combined release verschil
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) AI policy record
2+research: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
3+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on the use of AI tools in their scientific activities. This means that the way AI tools are used often needs to be described in detail in the Materials & Methods section and/or Supplementary Data, including prompts, output, name and version of the AI tool.
4+academic_integrity: VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
5+Evidence (en, 9c36448fe92b): Any form of fraud that constitutes a breach of scientific integrity, including the use of statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources, or the simulation or falsification of research data, is deemed an irregularity as referred to in this article.
6+research: VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
7+Evidence (en, fd15157c660d): The purpose of these guidelines is to assist researchers in the appropriate use of generative AI in their day-to-day research activities. They are applicable to use of generative AI in research processes. They do not apply to education.
8+research: For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
9+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): The VUB supports and encourages the use of AI tools by researchers. Our university would also like to point out to researchers the limitations and risks that the use of AI tools in research processes can entail.
10+privacy: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers serve not to enter the following data in AI tools : o Personal data: data that can (directly or indirectly) lead to the identification of persons
Geschiedenis releases
0 public release diffs
Aanpassingen claimen
5 Claimen registers
privacy
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
research
VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
research
For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
research
VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeld
Bronsnapshots
3 source attributions
AI Guidelines
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mei 2026, 05:06
Education and Examination Regulations 2025-2026
official_policy_page Tracker checked at 27 jul 2026, 02:40
Responsible use of artificial intelligence for research purposes
official_pdf Tracker checked at 16 mei 2026, 05:07