Journal des modifications

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB). Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits0Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée0Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) combined release

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) AI policy record
2+research: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.
3+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on the use of AI tools in their scientific activities. This means that the way AI tools are used often needs to be described in detail in the Materials & Methods section and/or Supplementary Data, including prompts, output, name and version of the AI tool.
4+academic_integrity: VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.
5+Evidence (en, 9c36448fe92b): Any form of fraud that constitutes a breach of scientific integrity, including the use of statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources, or the simulation or falsification of research data, is deemed an irregularity as referred to in this article.
6+research: VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.
7+Evidence (en, fd15157c660d): The purpose of these guidelines is to assist researchers in the appropriate use of generative AI in their day-to-day research activities. They are applicable to use of generative AI in research processes. They do not apply to education.
8+research: For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.
9+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): The VUB supports and encourages the use of AI tools by researchers. Our university would also like to point out to researchers the limitations and risks that the use of AI tools in research processes can entail.
10+privacy: VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.
11+Evidence (en, 87abaed132b7): Researchers serve not to enter the following data in AI tools : o Personal data: data that can (directly or indirectly) lead to the identification of persons

Historique des versions

0 public release diffs

Modifications d'affirmations

5 Affirmation enregistrements

academic_integrity

VUB's 2025-2026 Education and Examination Regulations classify as an irregularity fraud involving statements or texts produced by generative AI applications without reference to original sources.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen

privacy

VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers should not enter personal data into AI tools.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen

research

VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen

research

For research processes, VUB says it supports and encourages researchers' use of AI tools while also warning about limitations and risks.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance94%Preuve1Languesen

research

VUB's public AI guidelines are scoped to generative AI use in research processes and explicitly state that they do not apply to education.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve1Languesen

Instantanés source

3 source attributions