University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPL

Wijzigingslogboek

University of Limerick

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd16 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd16 mei 2026Claims6Bronnen5Releaseregistraties0
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

University of Limerick currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mei 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor University of Limerick. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

Er zijn nog geen beleidverschillen tussen releases geregistreerd voor deze universiteit. De pagina houdt nog steeds bij welke bronnen onderbouwing bieden, officiële bronaanwijzingen, de beoordelingsstatus, de actualiteit van bronnen en openbare JSON voor ontdekking en citatie.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd0Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd0Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Universiteit of Limerick combined release verschil

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Limerick AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.
3+Evidence (en, 895db1df092c): The Academic Integrity Policy and the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct, available on the UL Policy hub, indicate that it is a breach of academic integrity if AI is used in an unauthorised manner. In other words, it is the responsibility of the module leader/equivalent to decide and communicate the level of acceptable use of AI to students i.e. to determine what is authorised/unauthorised use.
4+academic_integrity: University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.
5+Evidence (en, 07c65bc24d73): The use of Gen AI in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead and/or programme lead is considered to be a form of academic misconduct, as described in the Academic Integrity Policy. Concerns relating to the unauthorised use of GenAI should be managed in accordance with the Procedures for Managing Allegations of Academic Misconduct.
6+security_review: UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
7+Evidence (en, 9a0425f7b5d3): The use of any tool within the University must be compliant with the UL Data Protection Policy, IT Security Policy, and the Acceptable Usage Policy. All tools being used within the University must go through the appropriate approval processes. Tools with a cloud aspect must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.
8+ai_tool_treatment: UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.
9+Evidence (en, 7bbfcf4b6a59): From a security and data integrity standpoint, if Gen AI is to be used by staff or students, the preferred platform is currently Microsoft Copilot, accessed through UL staff or student accounts. UL maintains a contractual agreement with Microsoft, a distinction not shared with other providers.
10+research: UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.
11+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): As a result, all outputs from Gen AI tools which we rely on for essential information or which will inform decisions or influence research must be independently verified.
12+teaching: University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.
13+Evidence (en, 3fb3c0866dd3): Given the variety of offerings, disciplines and courses, the question of legitimate use of AI within academia, will inevitably be a local decision. That is, a module coordinator, programme lead or Head of Department, will dictate the limits of legitimate uses of AI within module or programme design, in keeping with the module or programme aims and content.

Geschiedenis releases

0 public release diffs

Aanpassingen claimen

6 Claimen registers

academic_integrity

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

security_review

UL GenAI principles state that any tool used within the university must comply with UL data protection, IT security, and acceptable usage policies, and that cloud tools must be approved through the Cloud Governance process.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

UL student guidance says Microsoft Copilot accessed through UL staff or student accounts is currently the preferred GenAI platform from a security and data integrity standpoint when GenAI is used by staff or students.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

research

UL guidance states that outputs from GenAI tools relied on for essential information, decision-making, or research must be independently verified.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

teaching

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen

Bronsnapshots

5 source attributions