University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPLNL

Wijzigingslogboek

University of East London

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldLaatst gecontroleerd23 mei 2026Laatst gewijzigd23 mei 2026Claims4Bronnen2Laatste releasepublic-release-20260526-003Releaseregistraties1
UniversiteitspaginaOpenbaar JSONMaandrapportUniversiteitsindex

Samenvatting wijzigingen

Huidige actualiteit en beoordelingsstatus van openbare gegevens.

University of East London currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 23 mei 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.

Deze pagina combineert alle openbare releasediffs voor University of East London. Individuele releasesnapshots blijven beschikbaar via hun release-specifieke URL's.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots tonen hashwijzigingen voor dezelfde bron-URL en zijn op zichzelf geen beleidswijzigingen.

Diff-categorieën

Semantische classificatie voor deze release diff.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd4Bewijs0Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0Bron toegevoegd2Bron verwijderd0

Gecombineerd releasediff

Geünificeerde trackerdiff gegenereerd vanuit alle openbare releasesnapshots voor deze universiteit.

Universiteit of East London combined release verschil

public-release-20260526-001 vergelijken met public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Geschiedenis releases

1 verschil openbare publicatie

public-release-20260526-003

Vergeleken met public-release-20260526-001.

Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd4Bronsnapshots0Bron tekst0
Verschil van releaseDiff JSON

Universiteit of East London public-release-20260526-003 verschil

public-release-20260526-001 vergelijken met public-release-20260526-003.

+16-0
11 # University of East London AI policy diff
22 ## Source attribution added
33 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
4+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/general-policies/generative-artificial-intelligence-usage-policy snapshot 3f445bb16721b1abed489e3547b71c0d6fb45c5b9a3c0b88e6f9a55e5d5bc108
5+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
46 ## Source attribution added
57 An official source attribution was added to the tracker record.
8+Source https://www.uel.ac.uk/about/governance/manual-general-regulations/academic-integrity-academic-misconduct snapshot 1becfca5271f6e6f0e02cc957bf5b02ffa74c6369bd94ace2f9de0295a1edcfc
9+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
610 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
711 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
12+security_review: UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.
13+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): AI systems must be designed and implemented in ways that prioritise user safety and ethical standards. Clear documentation must be provided to ensure transparent and explainable AI. Robust security protocols must be implemented to protect AI systems from malicious attacks and unauthorised access.
14+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
815 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
916 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
17+academic_integrity: UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.
18+Evidence (en, 1becfca5271f): Generative AI: The use of generative artificial Intelligence tools to gain an unfair advantage. Such as ChatGPT, Bing Char or DALL-E to produce content that is then submitted as your own original work.
19+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1020 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1121 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
22+ai_tool_treatment: The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.
23+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): Scope: The policy applies to all staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates of UEL who engage in the development, deployment, or use of Gen AI technologies.
24+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z
1225 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
1326 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
27+ai_tool_treatment: UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
28+Evidence (en, 3f445bb16721): This policy provides a framework for the responsible and ethical use of Generative AI (Gen AI) at the University of East London (UEL). It emphasises transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.
29+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T14:46:00.000Z

Aanpassingen claimen

4 Claimen registers

ai_tool_treatment

The University of East London's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy applies to staff, students, third-party suppliers, partners, and affiliates who develop, deploy, or use GenAI technologies.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen96%Bewijs1Talenen

ai_tool_treatment

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%Bewijs1Talenen

academic_integrity

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%Bewijs1Talenen

security_review

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen91%Bewijs1Talenen

Bronsnapshots

2 source attributions