Change log

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

5 claim records

teaching

The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesde

privacy

The guide advises against entering personal or copyright-protected data into freely accessible free AI tools and recommends the University of Salzburg licensed tools Microsoft Copilot in M365 or Academic AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesde

academic_integrity

For exams, the guide says AI-tool use is at the discretion of teachers; if no corresponding rule has been made, AI tools are unauthorized aids and are not permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesde

teaching

The guide recommends specifying AI use along three levels: unrestricted use, use within a defined framework, or a general ban as an unauthorized aid.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesde

ai_tool_treatment

The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesde

Source snapshots

2 source attributions