research
NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 6, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+14-0
11 # Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) AI policy record
2+research: NTU states that generative AI should not be listed as an author of any paper with NTU affiliation, or as a Principal Investigator, Co-PI, or collaborator in research proposals.
3+Evidence (en, 1633bb1925de): GenAI (e.g. ChatGPT) should not be listed as an author of any paper with an affiliation to NTU; or listed as a Principal Investigator (PI), Co-PI, or collaborator in any research proposals.
4+research: NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.
5+Evidence (en, 1633bb1925de): In the interests of transparency and integrity, the use of GenAI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be appropriately acknowledged and cited. This would include acknowledging the use of any AI tools in their research proposals, manuscripts, and scholarly works through a statement specifying the tool's full name and version, its purpose of use, and how it was used.
6+academic_integrity: NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
7+Evidence (en, 1633bb1925de): Not citing or acknowledging the use of GenAI could be considered plagiarism (i.e. a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
8+privacy: NTU prohibits uploading confidential, sensitive, or personal data to external generative AI platforms unless specific conditions are met: legal compliance, restricted access, no data retention, and written permission from data owners.
9+Evidence (en, 1633bb1925de): Any confidential or sensitive information, and/or personal data must not be uploaded to any external GenAI software, system, or platform unless: The activity does not contravene any applicable laws, regulations, or institutional policies; Access to the GenAI is controlled and restricted to only authorised study members; The data is not retained in or by the GenAI; and Where applicable, written permission has been explicitly provided by the data owner.
10+academic_integrity: NTU states that misrepresenting AI-generated content as one's own work is considered academic misconduct under the 2025 NTU Academic Integrity Handbook.
11+Evidence (en, fe0af2b5c253): AI tools can assist your thinking but should not replace it; misrepresenting AI-generated content as your own work is considered academic misconduct.
12+teaching: NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.
13+Evidence (en, e4e18cda76ab): Research shows that the use of AI detector tools should be used with caution due to the following reasons. Unreliable Detection: Frequent false positives (human text flagged as AI) and false negatives (AI text missed). ... Discrimination: Bias against non-native writing patterns (e.g. ESL/EFL students).
14+teaching: NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.
15+Evidence (en, fe0af2b5c253): Use AI tools to support tasks such as brainstorming, outlining, or checking grammar, but ensure you disclose their use in your submissions. Always refer to your module's AI use policy and seek guidance from your instructor regarding specific expectations for acceptable AI usage in your courses.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
7 claim records
research
NTU states that generative AI should not be listed as an author of any paper with NTU affiliation, or as a Principal Investigator, Co-PI, or collaborator in research proposals.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
NTU prohibits uploading confidential, sensitive, or personal data to external generative AI platforms unless specific conditions are met: legal compliance, restricted access, no data retention, and written permission from data owners.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
NTU states that misrepresenting AI-generated content as one's own work is considered academic misconduct under the 2025 NTU Academic Integrity Handbook.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
NTU Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Research
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM
Policies & Guidelines - NTU Singapore
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM
Using AI Discovery Tools Responsibly
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 5, 2026, 10:11 PM