Change log

Warsaw University of Technology

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Warsaw University of Technology currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

6 claim records

source_status

Warsaw University of Technology has central Polish-language recommendations on the use of generative AI, attached to a March 2024 Senate position and later identified by a November 2024 Senate position as an integral part of WUT research-policy materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

privacy

WUT recommendations say users may not provide personal data, sensitive data, or other non-public information in prompts to GenAI systems, except for systems that do not share information with third parties, and should ensure generated-content use does not infringe third-party copyright.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagespl

academic_integrity

WUT recommendations say students, doctoral students, academic staff, and administrative staff are not authors of content generated by GenAI tools, so such materials must be clearly marked with the source of information, and GenAI should be used consistently with scientific integrity and good academic practice.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence2Languagespl

ai_tool_treatment

WUT recommendations say generative AI systems may support education and other university work, but users are responsible for how GenAI-generated content is used and are advised to verify and critically assess AI-generated materials.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

teaching

WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence2Languagespl

academic_integrity

An official WUT news item says each diploma thesis created at WUT is automatically checked through the national anti-plagiarism system and USOS/APD for both plagiarism and use of artificial intelligence.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%Evidence1Languagespl

Source snapshots

4 source attributions

Warsaw University of Technology AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker