academic_integrity
University of Sussex staff guidance suggests telling students that AI detection tools are fallible and cannot be relied upon.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Sussex
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Sussex currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.
Claim changes
6 claim records
teaching
University of Sussex AI principles say decisions on whether AI use is permitted, not permitted, optional, or required in learning or assessment will be made explicit.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
University of Sussex staff guidance says staff and students can access a data-protected Microsoft Copilot with Sussex credentials, and says university data such as learning and teaching content should be used in Copilot rather than less protected AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Sussex staff guidance provides a prohibited-use assessment statement saying generative AI tools must not be used to generate materials or content for that assessment, while allowing other assistive technology for registered reasonable adjustments.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Sussex staff guidance says module convenors determine and communicate AI-use permissions via module Canvas sites and choose one of three assessment-level permissions: AI use prohibited, AI in an assistive role, or AI with an integral role.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Academic misconduct
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:27 AM
AI and academic integrity
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:24 AM
AI tools
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:25 AM
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in education
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:26 AM
Talking with students about AI
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 4:28 AM