Change log

University of Reading

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Reading currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Reading. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Reading combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+12-0
11 # University of Reading AI policy record
2+ai_tool_treatment: University of Reading assessment guidance uses a three-category GenAI framework: Category 1 prohibits GenAI use, Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment, and Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.
3+Evidence (en-GB, df92d881bef0): Category 1 prohibits any GenAI use; Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment; Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.
4+academic_integrity: University of Reading's Section 9 Annex states that misuse of Generative AI is a form of cheating.
5+Evidence (en-GB, fab7a589a5b4): The misuse of Generative AI is a form of cheating.
6+academic_integrity: University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.
7+Evidence (en-GB, f9e42aa232a1): If the assignment brief says nothing about GenAI, assume its Category 1.
8+ai_tool_treatment: University of Reading student guidance says DeepSeek is blocked and must not be used on University devices or networks.
9+Evidence (en-GB, f9e42aa232a1): DeepSeek is blocked and must not be used on University devices or networks.
10+privacy: University of Reading staff guidance says Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat should not be used for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.
11+Evidence (en-GB, e8465834a86c): you should not use it for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.
12+academic_integrity: University of Reading's Study Advice LibGuide tells students doing assessed work to first check with the module convenor whether Generative AI use is permitted.
13+Evidence (en-GB, 058206254fb3): For assessed work, you should always first check with the module convenor whether use of Generative AI is permitted.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

6 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

University of Reading assessment guidance uses a three-category GenAI framework: Category 1 prohibits GenAI use, Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment, and Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading's Section 9 Annex states that misuse of Generative AI is a form of cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

University of Reading student guidance says DeepSeek is blocked and must not be used on University devices or networks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

privacy

University of Reading staff guidance says Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat should not be used for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading's Study Advice LibGuide tells students doing assessed work to first check with the module convenor whether Generative AI use is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

Source snapshots

5 source attributions