Change log

University of Reading

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Reading currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 15, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

6 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

University of Reading assessment guidance uses a three-category GenAI framework: Category 1 prohibits GenAI use, Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment, and Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading's Section 9 Annex states that misuse of Generative AI is a form of cheating.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

University of Reading student guidance says DeepSeek is blocked and must not be used on University devices or networks.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

privacy

University of Reading staff guidance says Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat should not be used for any data set containing personal or personal sensitive data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Reading's Study Advice LibGuide tells students doing assessed work to first check with the module convenor whether Generative AI use is permitted.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

Source snapshots

5 source attributions