research
UCT's EiRC research guideline says researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies and disclose AI use with a disclaimer or explanatory note describing where and how it was used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Cape Town
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Cape Town currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 14, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for University of Cape Town. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
University of Cape Town combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # University of Cape Town AI policy record
2+teaching: UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.
3+Evidence (en, 1a87bdd25ea5): UCT has developed the UCT Framework for AI in Education: Generative and other AI in Teaching, Learning and Assessment.
4+privacy: UCT advises administrative and support staff to treat AI inputs as public and not share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.
5+Evidence (en, ce547e63b297): Treat AI inputs as public: never share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.
6+research: UCT's EiRC research guideline says researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies and disclose AI use with a disclaimer or explanatory note describing where and how it was used.
7+Evidence (en, 57b7bd43ca90): Researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies.
8+academic_integrity: UCT says AI detection tools remain unreliable and that their use is not supported at UCT.
9+Evidence (en, 1a87bdd25ea5): AI detection tools remain unreliable and their use is not supported at UCT.
10+security_review: Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.
11+Evidence (en, ce547e63b297): Before procuring generative AI tools, staff or departments should consult with ICTS. All third-party AI tools must undergo an information security and privacy risk assessment.
12+teaching: UCT CILT publishes open-access AI guides for staff, students, and researchers, and also offers interactive AI guides on Amathuba for UCT staff and students.
13+Evidence (en, 6a98c73bc4c9): To support UCT staff and students to navigate GenAI in education, we have developed comprehensive guides accessible to anyone interested in understanding and engaging with GenAI responsibly.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
teaching
UCT CILT publishes open-access AI guides for staff, students, and researchers, and also offers interactive AI guides on Amathuba for UCT staff and students.
Review: Agent reviewed
security_review
Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
UCT advises administrative and support staff to treat AI inputs as public and not share personal, confidential, or UCT intellectual property with publicly available AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
UCT says AI detection tools remain unreliable and that their use is not supported at UCT.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Artificial Intelligence
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 6:05 PM
Artificial Intelligence for Teaching & Learning
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 6:07 PM
Guidelines and recommendations for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 6:08 PM
Responsible use of generative AI Tools at UCT for administrative and support staff
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 6:06 PM
UCT Ethics in Research Committee (EiRC) guidelines and recommendations for the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 6:09 PM